User talk:Ortolan57
Tommaso Valletti
[edit]Dear Ortolan57, would you please remove once again what you just inserted on my wikipedia page? I am Tommaso Valletti and never, ever got involved with the consultancy firm you refer to. They had put my name on their website as a bait. When this was brought to my attention some months ago, I asked to remove immediately my name, which they did. Adding to that, I was employed by the European Commission in 2016-19, so I could not have been on the payroll of anyone else in 2018. Much appreciated (and I am not good at editing on wikipedia, so apologies if this is not the right way of moderating a discussion). Tommaso Valletti
Real Ordine Principe Danilo I
[edit]lei dimostra una totale incompetenza, da “somaro” digitale protetto dall’anonimato, in quanto è preclaro che le persone da lei rimosse abbiano ricevuto l’Ordine di Danilo I, come consta da altre pagine. Lei è un perfetto idiota! Dott-Bayr (talk) 16:50, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
you have deleted authentic and truthful information
[edit]you have deleted authentic and truthful information. Dear Sir with the pseudonym Ortolan57, I am writing about your intervention that deleted all the news relating to the recipients of the Royal Order of Danilo I of the Royal House of Montenegro, and other news relating to the order and roles of the Royal House on the page news that you have deleted is news that comes from a source authorized to confirm. And not only is this Source authorized to confirm but it is the only one who can. In fact, I am the official representative of the royal house of Montenegro together with the diplomatic adviser of Prince Nicola Petrovich-Njegos, and only we own and manage the roles of all the orders of the royal house. His speech therefore showed that you are unaware of the current situation of the royal house. We therefore ask you to restore the correct information. I also remind you that the roles of the royal houses are private and are never published but are verifiable at the royal houses themselves, so demanding a link that confirms your claims is nothing short of a gross error. in bringing these changes I did not hide behind a pseudonym as you have but I put my name and surname and therefore I am an official source. Publications in the groups dedicated to the royal house are also available on social networks that report public photographs of the contributions you have canceled and therefore you want to deny the evidence of the facts that is visible in published photographs. If you persist in spreading erroneous news by deleting and not restoring the news posted by the royal house, the royal house of Montenegro will take legal action. Regards. GIUTEDESCHI (talk) 08:31, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |