Jump to content

User talk:Oronsay/Archive 18

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 15Archive 16Archive 17Archive 18Archive 19Archive 20Archive 25

Wikidata weekly summary #472

Editing news 2021 #2

Read this in another languageSubscription list for this newsletter

Junior contributors comment completion rate across all participating Wikipedias
When newcomers had the Reply tool and tried to post on a talk page, they were more successful at posting a comment. (Source)

Earlier this year, the Editing team ran a large study of the Reply Tool. The main goal was to find out whether the Reply Tool helped newer editors communicate on wiki. The second goal was to see whether the comments that newer editors made using the tool needed to be reverted more frequently than comments newer editors made with the existing wikitext page editor.

The key results were:

  • Newer editors who had automatic ("default on") access to the Reply tool were more likely to post a comment on a talk page.
  • The comments that newer editors made with the Reply Tool were also less likely to be reverted than the comments that newer editors made with page editing.

These results give the Editing team confidence that the tool is helpful.

Looking ahead

The team is planning to make the Reply tool available to everyone as an opt-out preference in the coming months. This has already happened at the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedias.

The next step is to resolve a technical challenge. Then, they will deploy the Reply tool first to the Wikipedias that participated in the study. After that, they will deploy it, in stages, to the other Wikipedias and all WMF-hosted wikis.

You can turn on "Discussion Tools" in Beta Features now. After you get the Reply tool, you can change your preferences at any time in Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)

00:27, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #473

July 2021 at Women in Red

Women in Red | July 2021, Volume 7, Issue 7, Numbers 184, 188, 202, 203, 204, 205


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 16:06, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

A kitten for you, & a huge Thank You!

Thank you so much for re-creating the article for Louise Milligan! I take my hat off to you for fixing this glaring, egregious hole in Wikipedia's coverage of both women & broadcasters/journalists (especially from south of the equator). It's been such an ongoing disgrace for the project that her original article was deleted (in 2012?!). You have righted a terrible wrong, so please bathe in the glory (with your new kitten, if you so choose :-D)

Cheers!

P.S. It would be great if your new article (& its edit history) could be merged with the old deleted one as a continuation (in order to preserve a public record of the progressive efforts of previous editors as well as to easily glean extra citations & details). Do you know if this is possible?

Bluevista99 (talk) 21:40, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Bluevista99, thank you for your enthusiastic gratitude. I have absolutely no idea whether your request is possible but will ask.--Oronsay (talk) 21:53, 27 June 2021 (UTC)


Wikidata weekly summary #474

Wikidata weekly summary #475

This Month in GLAM: June 2021





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Wikidata weekly summary #476