User talk:Ordocello
Discussion about wikifications etc...
my message to Wirbelwind :
Hi, Wirbelwind... I would like to have very clear indications as to how I can improve my article on this french metal group, since I notice you have comme to visit us :-) I would very much like to avoid suppression, as I am now working, as a musicologist (I am a doctor in musicology, name Isabelle Servant))on young metal groups in France (but very much noticeable, as I think Artefact is, with its two albums...) Did you have the time to judge fairly their music? if yes, then you are very dedicated, thank you But I must say I am quite surprised you never wrote anything on the talk page, which is the first thing wikipedians are supposed to do when they disapprove of anything this talk page on Artefact(band) is here : http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Artefact_%28band%29&action=edit By any means, show me any page where a fair debate can take place, thank you an read you soon I hope
--Ordocello 10:32, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Artefact
[edit]I have now done that; in all honesty I completely forgot! Thank you for reminding me, though - to be honest I was considering an adition to my user page telling people to poke me into doing something if I ever forgot to. Blood Red Sandman Open Up Your Heart - Receive My EviLove 07:32, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thank you so much Blood Red Sandman--Ordocello 14:06, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
It has definitively improved, and I did some minor cleanup too - the wacken battle section was rather pov and I added a template:tone to it since it reads more as an ad for the band "Artefact bore the colours of France" "new epics, and strong aggressive atmospheres" Keep on going! Spearhead 17:45, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- thanks for the help !--Ordocello 21:55, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Survey
[edit]Hi Ordocello!
I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!
It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!
Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!
Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 14:06, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
WikiWomen's Collaborative
[edit]| WikiWomen Unite! | |
|---|---|
 |
Hi Ordocello! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative. As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:
We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can get involved! |
WikiWomen's Collaborative: Come join us (and check out our new website)!
[edit]| WikiWomen - We need you! | |
|---|---|
 |
Hi Ordocello! The WikiWomen's Collaborative is a group of women from around the world who edit Wikipedia, contribute to its sister projects, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more! Get involved by:
Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- EdwardsBot (talk) 01:04, 10 January 2013 (UTC) |
Nomination of Artefact (band) for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Artefact (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artefact (band) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Laurent (talk) 16:37, 8 January 2015 (UTC)