User talk:Orcohen45

Welcome

Hello, Orcohen45, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! KunalForYou ^☎️^📝 05:39, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

May 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at New antisemitism, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — MShabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 05:57, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at New antisemitism. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — MShabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 06:06, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orcohen45, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi Orcohen45!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:22, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ARBPIA alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

— Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 21:20, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

History of the Palestinian people

Did you read the notice I left you in the preceding section, or the edit summary I left here?

History of the Palestinian people, like all articles related to the Arab–Israeli conflict broadly construed, is subject to a one-revert rule (abbreviated 1RR). That means an editor can make no more than one revert to a page within a 24-hour period. For more information, see WP:3RR, which describes the three-revert rule that applies globally on Wikipedia.

You have made two reverts on History of the Palestinian people, and unless you self-revert (undo your last edit to the article), you may be reported for edit-warring.

Instead of edit-warring, follow the advice I left here. Try to build consensus for your proposed change, or other editors will undo it. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 22:35, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Herut

Please stop inserting incorrect information into this article. Herut continued to exist until 1988. Start a discussion on the article's talk page if you have concerns about the article's content. Number 5 7 10:34, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please revert your change to the Herut article; Gahal was not a political party, it was an alliance. Number 5 7 10:42, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gahal's inclusion in List of political parties in Israel does not mean it is a political party; it was an alliance (and I have provided several reliable sources to state this at Talk:Herut). The list includes alliances (such as the Religious Torah Front and the United Religious Front) for the sake of simplicity. Number 5 7 11:08, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since you continue to edit war incorrect information into articles, you have been reported at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Number 5 7 13:15, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Iraq War

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Iraq War, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 10:39, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 10:49, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on History of the Palestinian people. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. RolandR (talk) 12:31, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Iraq War. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. RolandR (talk) 12:35, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Orcohen45 reported by User:RolandR (Result: ). Thank you. RolandR (talk) 13:54, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 22:09, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]