User talk:OrbitHawk

OrbitHawk, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi OrbitHawk! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Lightbreather (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Hello, I'm Jay-Sebastos. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Yankee Candle— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jay _{Σεβαστός}^discuss 08:59, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies about that. I completely misread what you wrote – I thought you had written "filthy" as opposed to "fifty". Apologies again! --Jay _{Σεβαστός}^discuss 08:15, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lincoln, Nebraska

Hi OrbitHawk, just a note to let you know the history section of Lincoln, Nebraska was spun off to History of Lincoln, Nebraska and a new article Timeline of Lincoln, Nebraska history was created. The history section in the article Lincoln, Nebraska was summarized with key points related to the historical development of Lincoln. Do feel free to add to the articles and timeline. Any help, of course, will be appreciated. Have a great day - Cheers Gmcbjames (talk) 22:55, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up! Wow, you two have done a lot of great work. Looks awesome! I hope to add what I can at some point, although these new articles are looking nearly comprehensive as is. :) --OrbitHawk (talk) 09:17, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yankee Candle

I see your point in regards to the reference, but is that the right place for them to be? I have come across numerous entries recently that seem to have this sub-repository in the reference section, mostly bare urls, and I'm trying to figure out why. Just curious on your thoughts. Thanks --AbeFrohman1977 (talk) 14:52, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment from 70.231.132.45

Hey! For the article purple drank there is a company called slomocup now making cups for it! I wanted to add that info in but I can't. Slomocup.com rappers are now selling them — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.231.132.45 (talk) 17:03, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this would be an appropriate inclusion in the article, but maybe, depending on whether there is a reliable independent source discussing it, as, say, a news item -- for example if there were citeable controversy over these cups. Otherwise mentioning this sort of thing quickly becomes an issue of promotion and/or WP:EL violation.

I'm personally not too interested in looking heavily enough into the matter to determine whether or not that info is seaworthy. My edit to that article was simply in the interest of minor maintenance. If you determine it to fall within Wikipedia's verifiability guidelines linked above, you can create an account and should be able to edit protected articles after (I believe) you have reached ten edits and four days. If you go to this much trouble I'd be more than willing to help you out with citing the source you find, and you should also be able to see examples of how citations lay out within the article source, but in this case (for a web source) the format you'd want to use would probably fall under the lines of <ref>{{cite web |url= |title= |author= |publisher= |date= |accessdate= }}</ref>. Alternatively, you may want to look at the edit history and contact editors who have contributed more significantly to that topic, or place an appeal to add said information on the article's talk page. --OrbitHawk (talk) 08:29, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How margin of error works — Statewide opinion polling, Democratic Party primaries, 2016

User All4peace (talk) has initiated a discussion, on the article talk page on English Wikipedia about how we present MOE.

I would very‐much appreciate your participation ! Info por favor (talk) 23:25, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, OrbitHawk. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lost Squadron

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Lost Squadron, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dammitkevin (talk) 15:02, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, I am not sure what you're talking about. Have I ever edited this page? Was it put up for speedy deletion? OrbitHawk (talk) 23:52, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What happened was you created a redirect (Lost Squadron) to Flight 19 and then X62225 then made it into a hoax article. It was the latter hoax article I was tagging for deletion but since you created the initial redirect the script sent the notice to you. I'm sorry about the confusion. Dammitkevin (talk) 14:21, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, OrbitHawk. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, OrbitHawk. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Picante" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Picante has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 10 § Picante until a consensus is reached. An anonymous username, not my real name 16:37, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"John B. Goodman (industrialist/polo magnate" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect John B. Goodman (industrialist/polo magnate has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 3 § John B. Goodman (industrialist/polo magnate until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:33, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]