User talk:Orbicle/archive1

Wilhelmenia Fernandez

I hope I didn't annoy you with my edit, but it seems all's OK now.Brownlee 12:21, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Marcelo Alvarez

Hello Orbicle, We are new to Wikipedia and had a lot of fun putting together the article on Marcelo Alvarez. Our initial posting has benefitted from re-formatting to summary paragraphs - thanks for the suggestion! Thanks also for adding the pictures :)

Since we're new to this, we don't know how to post this response to your comments directly in the Alvarez discussion page, and this is the best way we could figure out to contact you. If you have some pointers to simplify discussion, we'd appreciate it! Operagirl 21:34, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ariccia

There was already a link to Ariccia in the article. I've just linked to the other Palazzo Chigi. Ciao! --Attilios 13:21, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Magnani

I've noticed you're new here... Check my edits on Anna Magnani to have some hints about the style requested here. Don't use the </br>, simly add a blank line. Titles of movies must be within italics ''Title'', and normally dates in filmography must be within parenthesis (though this is disputed). Good work!!!--Attilios 13:30, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comments. However, most of the points you raise have nothing to do with my edits. Those things were already there. Compare http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anna_Magnani&diff=61093879&oldid=56120396 , and you will see that my changes were minimal and did not involve any of the things you reference. PS. In English, "an" Academy-Award winning actress.Orbicle 13:48, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gaetano Donizetti

Thank you for your note, but I am not sure what are you talking about. Could you be a bit more specific? I afraid, you probably mean the part of the article added by User talk:Doublea a day or so ago, so you need to re-address. (meladina 10:27, 20 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]

You wrote:

You have reverted all the grammatical, expression and spelling changes I made to your article. It makes no sense to me, unless it was done in error. Orbicle 09:50, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am referring to the changes made to the Gaetano Donizetti article of today's date. Check my changes. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gaetano_Donizetti&diff=64821825&oldid=64819573 and http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gaetano_Donizetti&diff=64816480&oldid=64733534 . Thanks Orbicle 10:52, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is very strange and worrying. I did not make these changes. They have been done by somebody else, who has managed to use my signiture (I have no idea how), and this is a sort of vandalism. It is probably needs of an investigation. Sorry for this. And thank you very much for your correction. Yours, (meladina 11:14, 20 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]

I think I know what it was actually happend. I have edited, by mistake, a previous version of an article by User talk:Doublea (before it was corrected by you) adding to it only some stuff to the "Quotations" area. I will try to reverse it with your corrections, but please check what I've done about in 10-20 minutes time. Yours (meladina 12:08, 20 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]

I've just returned all your corrections back. Could you check and let me know, that everything is allright now, please? (meladina 12:15, 20 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Opera contributions

Hi Orbicle. Great work on all your detail-oriented additions to the opera articles! I hope you add to your user page so we can learn more about you. Fireplace 17:57, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Fireplace. Still finding my feet. Maybe when I feel more comfortable, I will add something more to my page. Orbicle 18:10, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bette Davis

Hi Orbicle. I've been thinking that I should not have reverted the trivia sections without actually fixing the problem. I was a bit hasty (trivia sections are my pet hate, but that's my problem). To answer your question about what to do when people add trivia to the body of the article : the simple answer is to remove the information if it is not relevant. If it is relevant and the problem is that it was badly worded or inappropriately placed, then rewrite and replace it. This was my error with the Bette Davis comments. I could easily have reworded them and placed them into a better context. I've been working on the article on and off over the last few months, but so far I've really only looked at the first half of it. I think it needs a section relating to her "legacy" ie what has happened since she died and how she is viewed. (see Vivien Leigh for a similar postscript). The bit about Spielberg retrieving her Oscar could go there. The bit about the "Bette Davis Eyes" single should go into the body of the article where the song is discussed but trimmed down slightly. It's a little too detailed. The Bette Midler reference doesn't really "belong" anywhere. Perhaps it could just be deleted. This is all just my opinion though. Maybe you could have a look at Wikipedia:Trivia and Wikipedia Talk:Trivia to see how other editors have viewed this situation. Rossrs 01:26, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone back over it. Moved the "Bette Davis Eyes" info into the body of the article, the Spielberg buying back her Oscar into the Awards and nominations section, removed the Midler and references in pop songs altogether. They may be able to go back when there's somewhere to put them. I think it's better but would be interested in your opinion. Rossrs 07:22, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just have to say that I love your hates! I didn't think of them when I was making my list or they'd be on there. 14:45, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Mso.five0306 big 2.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mso.five0306 big 2.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:07, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kallen Esperian

Hi Orbicle. I wanted to thank you for your expansion of the Kallen Esperian article today. I wrote the stub a few months ago, but wasn't able to find nearly enough information to write a full aritcle. The article is much better after your additions. Incidentally, I met Eseperian and her husband a couple years ago when I bought a chair from them; extremely nice people. Thanks! · j e r s y k o talk · 00:37, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comments! That was fast, I only just finished writing the article. Orbicle 00:40, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

...for letting me know about Sir Toby Belch. I had gone through a list of his characters and obviously missed it. Sure enough, it was there. The role isn't mentioned in the article, so I'll leave it off the lead paragraph. Rossrs 14:27, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Fuzzy.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Fuzzy.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:04, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Irene Worth

Sorry!!

Incredibleshrinkingman 14:41, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Carlos Thompson

I replied to your question on the Carlos Thompson talk page. --Kauko56 21:12, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ivanhoe

There's nothing wrong with the old wording. It's just that if I see an equally good way of phrasing something using fewer words, I go for it. If you want to change it back, be my guest. Clarityfiend 22:55, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ursula_Thiess.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ursula_Thiess.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:40, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

1. The image referred to above Image:Ursula_Thiess.jpeg is a film star "cigarette card". I have put the promotional picture tag, but there is no equivalent category (such as Movie poster) in the licensing.

2. I don't seem to be able to put these two new categories so that they appear in the right place: Category:Films directed by George Stevens and Category:Films directed by Anatole Litvak, the latter appears under "F" and the former not at all. What am I doing wrong? Thanks Orbicle 11:05, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The image is all right now. (I've removed the "unknown" tags) The categories are working fine. The George Stevens category can be found on the second page of the listing [1]. I've fixed the Litvak category to sort properly under "L". Cheers, Tangot a ngo 11:29, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ouch, Tangotango beat me :) Here was what I meant to type before edit conflicting:

I've added the categories and they appear to be working. I just hit edit this page and added them below - is this what you wanted, or am I missing something? The tag you added seems appropriate to me; I suggest we leave it as it is for now. Hope that helps. —Xyrael / 11:31, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See my contributions and diffs. :) - Tangot a ngo 11:33, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of Epic Films

It was deleted in the last couple of weeks, I think because not everyone was satisfied there was a NPOV definition of what constitutes an epic film. JW 09:39, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of people

(You wrote on my talk:)
You changed "actress" to "actor" (in the case of an actress).

Why?
What does lo-res terminology mean?

Thanks.
Orbicle 08:18, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re #2,

_ _ The the "low resolution terminology" is something i observed and adopted on LoPbN tree. I am now probably the most frequent maintainer of it, and AFAIK the only one who uses the term out loud, tho i think the practice is followed by all the frequent LoPbN contributors to a high degree.

_ _ Its purpose is inherant in the justification of the existence of LoPbN: the tree is a navigational device helping users find bio articles in two situations where they roughly know the name of the person they are looking for:

They don't have the exact spelling of the article title (or of a Rdr to it)
They aren't sure they have that, and choose to surf to the bio via an eyeball search ("it should be somewhere near this or the next thing i'll try ... ah, there it is") rather than by possibly repetitive typing.

More concretely, the entries must support the purpose by avoiding clutter: being terse except where additional detail is likely to contribute to speedy navigation. If two American politicians are commonly called by the same name, the dates of the one the reader is after may not, where they heard of her, have been clear enuf to distinguish them. Thus the situation calls for more info than "American politician", say

American politician -- Georgia

or

American politician -- Senate

(depending on whether the other one was also a Senator but from Vermont, or also from Georgia but in the Cabinet rather than ever being in Congress).

_ _ Have said that much, i must add, even if it's obvious to you, that having

Lenin, Vladimir (1870-1924), Russian activist & politician

rather than

Lenin, Vladimir

serves two purposes despite the lack of ambiguity in the name:

When some commentator emulates Adam Smith or Engelbert Humperdinck in adopting as pseudonym the name of a well-known figure of a dead generation, we don't have to scramble to add info to the "real" Lenin's entry when a new editor adds the entry for the "imitator".
While probably nothing can keep some new editors from adding entries (or even expanding adequate existing entries) with phrases that include several verbs and maybe a relative pronoun, the simplicity, as in 90% of entries, of vital stats, passport-nationality, and life-role that provides notability, is so immeidately visible that setting that uniform minimum probably does forestall a lot of cluttered entries.

Re your #1,

"Why not?" More respectfully stated, modern dictionaries say an actor is "one who acts" without specifying males, nor even adding "especially males".
The term "actress" reflects several traditions: that female parts be played by boys, that no women but a slut would venture onto a stage, and (more modernly) that actresses are "starlets" (no masculine equivalent) who get glamour and better-than-working-class conditions in return for providing studio execs with the perquisites of the casting couch, and that actresses don't have too act, but only to look attractive, and once they're less attractive than the current crop of starlets, acting skill is insufficient to sustain their careers. Any female actor today who's willing to make waves describes herself as an actor, drawing attention to her skills in contrast to any assumption she's a mere starlet. Calling her an actor can be intended as flattery, but it is always accurate so there should be no presumption of PoV. Calling her an actress may be offensive, and is confusing bcz it leaves it unclear whether low skill and/or victimhood are being implicitly stated.
Using "actress" rather than "actor" is not significant clutter, but it does invite the impresssion that "female wrestler", "female boxer", "female [field -- and ice?] hockey player", "female pilot", "female soldier", "female murderer" and so on are improvements over the omission of gender. The only word i can think of, more worthless to navigation on LoPbN than "female" (or male) is "professional", since 50% of possible people are ruled out by "female", while "professional" only helps you rule out a few percent of notable people. (In contrast, it is quite valuable to label a (notable) amateur scientist as such: those seeking them are thereby help in distinguishing them from a large number of professionals, a few of whom might share the same name.) Even "American", "Chinese", and "Indian" rule out a lot of people; "female" (or "male") are too nondescript to be justify their contribution to clutter, even for the people whose gender isn't obvious from their names.

I'm not sure how much significance the potential for offense should be given, but the tendancy of "actress" to encourage adding "female" for other professions (and male before, e.g., "nurse") is quite sufficient reason for removing it.

--Jerzy•t 22:25, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:MOIRASHEARERSQ.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:MOIRASHEARERSQ.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:06, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Operas by composre

Hi there! Each of the articles in question was in a category [[Category:Operas by Foo]], which was a sub-cat of [[Category:Operas by composer]]. If you put an article under [[Category:Operas by composer|Mozart, Wolfgang Amadeus]], but the name of the opera is [[La clemenza di Tito]], it's sorted under "M" rather than "C". The composer name sort is not apparent to a user who's just looking for La clemenza di Tito under "C"; the correct sort would be [[Operas by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart|Clemenza di Tito, La]]. Thus [[Category:Operas by composer]] should only contain sub-categories [[Category:Operas by Foo]], or articles which are lists of operas by composer. Hope this makes sense - Her Pegship 15:09, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Clark Gable.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Clark Gable.jpeg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Rossrs 11:07, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You said: "You removed the image in the Clark Gable article and then informed me that it was orphaned and not used in any article! Why is the use of a TIME Cover depicting the subject of the article not fair use when the sole fact of appearing on a TIME cover is of itself a comment on the fame of the subject? You know what? Don't worry about it. I am growing increasingly weary of people who nitpick and edit seemingly just for the sake of it. In my view, it is fair use; in your view it is not. Have a good day. Orbicle 14:54, 23 November 2006 (UTC)"[reply]

The fair use of any image is not self evident but must be supported. The image was not discussed in the article, there was no image caption, and no fair use rationale on the image description page - it was completely unsupported. It was just sitting there in the middle of the article. TIME covers are used only in exceptional circumstances because TIME still uses these images for sale. They're probably more likely to exercise their rights than some other copyright holders who don't actively sell their images. Who knows? The tag you added to the image reads in part that the image could be used "to illustrate an article, or part of an article, which specifically describes the issue in question or its cover", but it didn't. I grow increasingly weary of editors who disregard Wikipedia's policies, but think that if someone brings it to their attention, they have the right to respond in a rude manner for no reason other than that they disagree. It's also unfortunate that instead of limiting your discussion to the issue at hand, you chose to personalise this by making an assumption about my motives and commenting on your view of my shortcomings as an editor. Rossrs 06:56, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:1156196235.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:1156196235.jpeg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 11:59, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gable article pic

I happened to come across your exchange with Rossers about the Clark Gable image that he deleted, so thought I might be able to help. I scanned an autographed 8X10 glossy I own, and reworked it a bit after scanning it. It's now my own creation, which I freely licensed to wiki. If, for whatever reason, they delete that one, too, I will take a screenshot from the trailer for Gone With The Wind. That I know is allowed. God, some people can be tight asses, can't they? Jeffpw 22:05, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message about the pic. I hope the Wikipolice let you keep it. I particularly appreciate your support. I find it astonishing that through the minefield of copyright restrictions in Wikipedia, there is so little opportunity for people to take a step back, use their common sense and think. We are dealing here with film stars who have left a legacy of a zillion photographs, promotional pictures, film lobby cards, posed photos, candid shots, posters, films, interviews etc but because of the lurking vigilantes the articles about them are usually reduced to having blurry, out of focus photos. (I am speaking in general here, not referring to your picture). Best regards. Orbicle 23:57, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- Just keeping you up to date:

The pic in question, Rossrs, was one I bought at auction. It is an autographed 8X10 glossy, presumably taken by MGM in the very early 30s. I cropped it. I horozontally mirrored it. I added sepia tones. I angled it. I added extra pixles. I added blue tones. I added red tones. In short, I took an image of a dead person and made it a creation of my own, which I then freely licensed to Wiki out of the goodness of my heart. If this still does not satisfy the Wiki Brownshirts who are currently running rampant on this site, then by all means delete it and I will take a screenshot from the theatrical trailer of Gone With The Wind. Jeffpw 10:01, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And you're right, of course. Movie stars (and their estates) make it their business to get their image out in front of the public every chance they have. They have a vested interest in accruing as much publicity as possible; and the use of an image on a site like Wiki is almost sure to go uncontested, in that it stimulates interest in the person in question, and potentially causes readers to go out and buy more of the subject's product. Jeffpw 10:26, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FILMS Newsletter

The November 2006 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Cbrown1023 23:26, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Debbie-reynolds.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Debbie-reynolds.jpeg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Quentin X 13:24, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cinema of France

No, I did not misspell those names on purpose, and besides, I am from Canada, and I think that's how you spell it in Canadian French

Image:Premiere.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Premiere.jpeg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Oden 23:23, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Garbo_the_painted_veil.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Garbo_the_painted_veil.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:29, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FILMS Newsletter

The December 2006 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also, if you have not already, add your name to the Member List. Cbrown1023 00:47, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Anatomy of a Murder poster.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Anatomy of a Murder poster.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 14:59, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Watusi1.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Watusi1.jpeg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 23:06, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Watusi (film).jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Watusi (film).jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 23:08, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alan Webb

Hi, please don't do moves via cut and pasting the text of the article, like you did here. It makes a mess of the contribution history that someone else has to clean up, which takes a lot more time and effort than if you had simply used the move button in the first place. Thanks. - Bobet 13:37, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Olivier

I wanted to thank you for your excellent additions to the Olivier entry! And especially for correcting my ridiculous error that Katherine Hepburn played opposite Olivier in Long Day's Journey into Night! Of course it was Constance Cummings! I confused the Richardson film and am now deeply ashamed! Thanks for your work!

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Desiree.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Desiree.jpeg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. MECU≈talk 02:56, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Anna Netrebko .jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Anna Netrebko .jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:26, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Teresa Stratas2.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Teresa Stratas2.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:27, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Merman1124m.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Merman1124m.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 08:56, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Is Paris Burning .jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Is Paris Burning .jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 23:51, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:The Robe .jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:The Robe .jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 00:12, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Who'll Stop The Rain .jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Who'll Stop The Rain .jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 00:57, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Martin Roumagnac.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Martin Roumagnac.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 00:58, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Stamp-ctc-streetcar-named-desire.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Stamp-ctc-streetcar-named-desire.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 03:31, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Guys and Dolls.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Guys and Dolls.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 10:47, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Jezebel .jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Jezebel .jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 10:51, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Pret-a-Porter .jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Pret-a-Porter .jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 10:57, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Prime Suspect1 .jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Prime Suspect1 .jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 11:41, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please expand Monseiur Perier from francais. Ernst Stavro Blofeld 18:42, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Dana_Wynter_1_1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Dana_Wynter_1_1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:36, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:DuBarry was a lady.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:DuBarry was a lady.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 00:07, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Ivanhoe.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ivanhoe.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 00:11, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:VIPs.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:VIPs.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 00:11, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:French Line.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:French Line.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 00:12, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:GuysdollsFR.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:GuysdollsFR.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 00:12, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Beau Brummell.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Beau Brummell.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 00:15, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Please-Dont-Eat-the-Daisies.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Please-Dont-Eat-the-Daisies.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 00:21, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Ps02.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ps02.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 00:28, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:ActressTC.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:ActressTC.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 00:36, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Blondvenuslarge.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Blondvenuslarge.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 01:03, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Image22.18.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Image22.18.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 05:38, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Films Newsletter

The January 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Nehrams2020 06:03, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tebaldi

Excuse me for replacing a crap picture with a good one on an article for a singer I don't even like! Viva La Callas!

NewYork1956 10:31, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You replied:

So much for objectivity! I now know what importance to attach to your edits.

Ha! You had a book cover as the main picture for an article about a singer. I shouldn't have removed it completely I agree, but it certainly was not the appropriate picture for there.

NewYork1956 10:55, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Mitzi Gaynor9 .jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Mitzi Gaynor9 .jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 06:26, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:NCAlbum.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:NCAlbum.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 10:38, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Rosa Ponselle .jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Rosa Ponselle .jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 10:49, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Rosa PonselleCD.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Rosa PonselleCD.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 10:50, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:CouvertureDefinitive.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:CouvertureDefinitive.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 13:40, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Prime Suspect1 .jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Prime Suspect1 .jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 18:54, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Tracy Hepburn.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Tracy Hepburn.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 18:55, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Priest of Love.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Priest of Love.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 19:33, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Alexander the Great.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Alexander the Great.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 00:47, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Gertrude.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Gertrude.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 23:25, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Touch of Evil1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Touch of Evil1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 23:28, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Psycho1.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Psycho1.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 07:16, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]