User talk:Orangeisgreen

Speedy deletion of Orangecup

A tag has been placed on Orangecup, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 07:04, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Orangecup. While objective prose about products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Thank you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 07:05, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think I might be confused... I thought that this was my non-public page (sandbox) to test out my page before it goes public. Am I wrong and if so, can you help me find my sandbox? Thank you!--Orangeisgreen (talk) 07:15, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I'm just a passer by noticing you seem to be having some trouble. The article mentioned above is in fact one you created on Wikipedia, and not a private one. At the moment it seems the article was written purely for an advertising purpose. I would suggest you read up on Wikipedia's policies, starting from WP:What Wikipedia is not (though I don't remember if that makes mention of advertising, but it'll certainly link you to other policies). Now, you can however work on the article on your own "private sandbox" as you call it. To do so, simply create an article over at User:Orangeisgreen/Orangecup for example (click this red link to create the page) and then simply copy all the content in the current Orangecup article and let the "real" article be deleted while you can work on your own private one. When you are satisfied with the article you have written, you can then perform a page move, thus creating the article on Wikipedia for the public, and this will be put to consensus on whether the article is relevant to Wikipedia or not. Hope this helps! --Please reply on my talk page! Thanks :)Razor ICE 07:28, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved the material from your user page to the User:Orangeisgreen/Orangecup sandbox page. Bear in mind, though that this in no way addresses the issues concerning lack of notability. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 07:32, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User:Orangeisgreen

A tag has been placed on User:Orangeisgreen, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:User:Orangeisgreen|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 07:06, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FYI Conflict of interest guideline

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Orangecup, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. — Athaenara ✉ 07:50, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of OrangeCup

A tag has been placed on OrangeCup, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Destin (talk) 21:52, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for Image:OrangeCup.png

Thanks for uploading Image:OrangeCup.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 22:49, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]