User talk:OrangeStu

Welcome! As you seem pretty clued in on the ways of Wikipedia I will not bother with all the helpful links.... Lame Name (talk) 20:01, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kathy Clugston Tom Tom

Wikipedia requires that content is verifiable so the article should have some point of reference to enable a reader to check for themselves. I do not have a sat nav so am unable to check for a mention of a Kathy (which may or may not be the same person). Articles about people should be particularly cautious when making claims that cannot be verified - "material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion". Without a reliable source it should not be in the article. Lame Name (talk) 20:09, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edited comment

Hi, I hope you don't mind too much, but I edited your comment on the European winter storms of 2009–2010's talk page. I felt it neccesary as you said it was the worst weather for over thirty years. It was in fact the worst for nearly thirty years (28 years to be exact, since it was last this bad in 1982). Jolly Ω Janner 21:46, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Doctor Who (series 5). Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. ╟─Treasury Tag►constabulary─╢ 15:23, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]