User talk:OrangePie

Your repost of Cavenger was deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cavenger. Please do not recreate the article. If you want a review of the deletion decision, follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Deletion review. NawlinWiki 14:01, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Michael Hardaway, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company or website, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable. If you can indicate why Michael Hardaway is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Michael Hardaway. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert his/her/their notability, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable.

A young businessman running a startup does not normally meet our standards at Wikipedia:Notability (people). Also, citations should be from Wikipedia:Reliable Sources, which does not include blogs. Fan-1967 18:10, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Hardaway

I have deleted this page because it is a biography about a person that does not establish his notability, and because it is directly related to a page that was deleted via articles for deletion. If you can show how this person is notable, you may recreate the article. -- Merope ^Talk 18:11, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cavenger

You have recently re-created the article Cavenger, which was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a deletion review. -- Merope ^Talk 18:38, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Response to your message

Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by administrators or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you.

The reason the article is being deleted is not because I don't believe it exists, it is because it provides no evidence that it is notable. If your corporation is notable, please indicate this by using citations of reliable sources. -- Merope ^Talk 18:43, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Response

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks, you will be blocked for disruption.

The links do not constitute reliable or verifiable sources. Please stop your personal attacks and read Wikipedia's policies before you make further edits. -- Merope ^Talk 18:48, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The key word in that sentence is reliable sources. Please click the link to find out what constitutes a valid source. -- Merope ^Talk 18:52, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cavenger

If you would like to contest the deletion (since it was deleted through WP:AFD), you should take it up with the deletion review. -- Merope ^Talk 19:02, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dog1.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Dog1.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:06, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]