User talk:Opticyclic

Welcome!

Hello, Opticyclic, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! (aeropagitica) (talk)

Immittance

Hello! Wikipedia is not a dictionary; you might want to submit dictionary definitions to Wiktionary instead. Can you expand upon this topic in order to turn the article in to an encyclopedic topic? (aeropagitica) (talk) 17:06, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete Immitance?

Although it was only at the stage of a dictionary definition, it would be useful to link it to the Impedance and Admittance pages. Maybe via a redirect. Being a stub it was supposed to encourage more people to modify it before I got round to completing it. Opticyclic 11:24, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see from your Talk page that it was Immittance with two 't's. Yes, the article didn't say anything much really, barely even a dictionary definition and Wikipedia is not a dictionary. You can expand the article to include more notable features of the concept in order to retain it. If you or no other editor has nothing to add then it doesn't stand as an encyclopedic article, {{db-empty}} applying, as above. Regards, (aeropagitica) (talk) 16:20, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Murex SAS

A tag has been placed on Murex SAS, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 15:07, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of CubicExplorer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CubicExplorer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CubicExplorer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ❤ Yutsi ^Talk/ Contributions ( 偉特 ) 00:38, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Immittance for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Immittance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Immittance until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:45, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]