User talk:Optakeover/Archive/2017/October

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East Point Software

No opposition to deletion; 3 vs 0. I would like to draw your attention to WP:NOQUORUM, which favours soft deletion if there is no opposition to the deletion proposal and minimal participation. Please remember this upon further closing and relisting. J947^{(c) (m)} 05:44, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

J947 No room for a third relist? Optakeover^(U)(T)(C) 06:06, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

J947 Thanks for the edit, but you didn't really answer my question. Is there not room for a third relist? Where does it say a third relist is uncalled for? I hear there has been an RFC regarding this so I want to know where I can find the consensus on the number of relists for such AfDs. Optakeover^(U)(T)(C) 14:33, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Normally third relists are controversial and uncalled for, so I rarely do them except for exceptional circumstances, e.g. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kilcoole gun-running or sources found but no one has addressed them. J947^{(c) (m)} 19:05, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Misfired revert

Hello.

Sorry for the misfired revert. There was a delay between the time I saw the page in watchlist and the time I actually committed the reversion. I used the "cur" link and didn't see your action. I should have noticed the Twinkle's message that there are 3 intervening edits, not 2.

Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 13:42, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Thank you Codename Lisa for the message, but I do not know which revert you were referring to. Could you tell me more? Optakeover^(U)(T)(C) 13:46, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Cerebral palsy

Why did you do this? --122.108.141.214 (talk) 04:03, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

If you look at the diff, it was you and not me who removed content from the article. Please don't use Wikipedia robots on autopilot. --122.108.141.214 (talk) 04:31, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for restoring my content. --122.108.141.214 (talk) 04:42, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

dharmashala,kannur page edits reversed

hi i got your message regarding reversal of edits i made in Dharmashala,kannur page.I am new to wikipedia and sorry for any mistakes from my part against wiki policies.And the part i removed under political violence is 100percent is a fake information.I doubt that the wikipedian who added that information may be having some political motives to spread this information.I am a native of that place for last 30years from my birth so i am very sure that there was no such political murders of 8people in Dharmashala in 2008.so i made that change to remove that misleading fake information.when considering political scenario here it is always a communist party of india-Marxist strong hold and Rashtriya swayam sevak sangh not there even in the scene .Go to this link for bettter understanding http://www.smarchives.org/result/anthoor-municipality-election-result-2015-17298.html Kerala Local Body Election Result 2015 ,shows 28 out of 28 wards in the municipality won by CPIM lead LDF.There is no such political violence issue in this area.The previous editor who added that may be referring to political murders happened in some other part of kannur districts such as Koothuparambu ,Panoor etc.,in that sense it is correct,but then he shuould add that in kannur page not in Dharmashala page.Dharmashala is only a place in Kannur district,and that is not a reason for adding this fake misleading information in this wiki page.i hope you understood.I am totally new to wiki so i am not removing contents any more,because i am not familiar with wiki terms .thank you Pnc4u (talk) 18:36, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

AIV

Hey, Optakeover, did you by chance report the wrong person to AIV? It looks like Person who formerly started with "216" has been reverting vandalism, not adding it. (I was reviewing the report when they removed it, which I don't disagree with.) Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 17:01, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

He said he did. I reverted the accidental, false addition on the AIV and clarified in the edit summary, just so ya know. Person who formerly started with "216" (talk) 17:03, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

(edit conflict) @Writ Keeper: Yes, I did, I realised my mistake when I revisited AIV, and I have already conveyed my apologies to 216 here. I could have done worse to deserve the stocks... Optakeover^(U)(T)(C) 17:04, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Gotcha. Happens to the best of us every now and then. :) Happy Halloween, y'all! Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 17:06, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

I don't think Matthew hk is a vandal either. It looks like you both are working on cleaning up the same vandalism, and you're reverting each other. I'm not seeing them as a sock of anyone. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:34, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

@RickinBaltimore: He reverted my reversion of vandalism at [1]. But I admit I should have checked more closely, sorry. Optakeover^(U)(T)(C) 18:37, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, I mean reverted my reversion at [2]. Optakeover^(U)(T)(C) 18:38, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

@RickinBaltimore: I'm dead wrong. Primefac has already explained to me. By the way, you might want to peruse WP:Administrators' Noticeboard/Incidents#Abuse of rollback and warning template, edit war by User:Optakeover. Optakeover^(U)(T)(C) 19:12, 31 October 2017 (UTC)