User talk:Opo9

Opo9, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Opo9! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Osarius (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Blocked

This account has been blocked on the grounds of block evasion. It is a sockpuppet of LTA Tripple-ddd. Sergecross73 msg me 13:04, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Opo9 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sergecross73 is accusing me of being a sockpuppet of User talk:Tripple-ddd, which is there is no correlation of. The discussion ended on me supposedly doing edits that are deemed as disruptive and without consensus. However these articles that I ahev edited have no basis on being built on discussions and consensus building before editing. So I am not making sense of this at all. I would want to be unblocked so I can disscuss this matter further.--Opo9 (talk) 23:13, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The evidence laid out on User talk:Sergecross73 is sufficient to warrant a block. Your arguments against this are unpersuasive. PhilKnight (talk) 00:03, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.