User talk:Opheliajw

Hi all, There is no theory page presently, so I get to start it from scratch. Sorry for not making that clear!

Hi, Here is my link to my sandbox: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Yw59/sandbox — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yw59 (talk • contribs) 17:16, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot find the page of your theory article. Well, I’ve read the contents you put in your sandbox, and it seems that you are on the right track. I think you present the theory well. As for now, since I don’t know what contents that the current theory page has, I don’t know what parts of the page should strengthen; However, I think your work is ok so far. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yw59 (talk • contribs) 19:59, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Ophelia Jw, kristin says what is F&M, and thank you , u r my first visitor!!

Hey Ophelia,

Just looked over your sandbox. From the looks of it, you are starting with a clean slate (unless I just can't find the actual wiki page). I can see your are still working on developing the intro. Might I suggest, including a "critique" and "background" section. Also, it would be great to have a visual (for us visual learners) of the cycles an organization goes through. I am not sure know how easy that would be to place into the wiki. Also, a few more references wouldn't hurt. I look forward to reading more about this theory. It was actually my top pick, so I am a little jealous you got it. :)

--Bgwiki15 (talk) 14:19, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fine Art Edit-a-Thon & DC Meetup 26!

Fine Art Edit-a-Thon & Meetup - Who should come? You should. Really.

FINE ART EDIT-A-THON & DC MEETUP 26 is December 17! The Edit-a-Thon will cover fine art subjects from the Federal Art Project and the meet up will involve Wikipedians from the area as well as Wiki-loving GLAM professionals. You don't have to attend both to attend one (but we hope you do!) Click the link above and sign up & spread the word! See you there! SarahStierch (talk) 20:36, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jennifer,

In your introduction, I think you might be using the term equivocally when you mean to use equivocality.

There's also a typo in Weick's name in the Critique section.

Like I mentioned in class last week, there are opportunities for linking to additional wikipedia articles; for instance:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_management http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wanda_Orlikowski http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trial_and_error

are just a few that jumped out at me.

You have a lot of extra white space in the Additional Readings section; perhaps you should re-format them as a bullet list using an asterisk at the beginning of each line.

AlbinoFlea (talk) 20:16, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed changes to Organizational Information Theory Wiki Page

Hi Ophelia:

My name is Scott and I'm a first-year grad student at Georgetown CCT who is presently working on updating the Organizational Information Theory page you started (great job in kicking it off, BTW!).

For continuity's sake, I wanted to make you aware of the changes I'm proposing, as they will build on your already solid foundation. For starters, I would like to build out the introduction to include a little more regarding the Theory core, as it will offer the reader a snapshot of what's to come. Additionally, I anticipate adding a couple of headers (i.e., on Equivocality and Choice Points, as each expands on topics you've already successfully delved into.

Finally, I hope to included an 'applied works' section showing how OIT is utilized within my core area of study, Health Care. Please let me know if you have any questions regarding the changes I've proposed.

My best, Lf480 (talk) 22:26, 16 November 2014 (UTC)Scott[reply]