User talk:Operalala

Welcome from the Opera Project

Hello Operalala, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

Delighted to see you are posting about opera. We would be pleased if you like to formally sign on to the project on the main page. Let me know if I can help in any way.

Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Kleinzach 01:36, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:La mamma-morta---Andrea Chenier-Umberto Giordano---Antonietta Stella---1955.ogg

Thanks for uploading Image:La mamma-morta---Andrea Chenier-Umberto Giordano---Antonietta Stella---1955.ogg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:09, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Minimal stubs

Hi. I've had much time recently to look at sopranos, but I see you are creating some stubs - on some worthwhile singers. May I suggest that you create stand-alone stubs with enough detail to be viable as Google-lookups? With a singer that means dates, sources and a least some note of why they are important. Otherwise there is a danger that they will just be deleted, not by me - I'm not going to delete Tucci, Frittoli and Devia - but by one of the resident rule-enforcers. If you want to develop the articles slowly that's fine but you can do that on your own user page/sandbox without any danger of deletion. OK? -- Kleinzach 04:16, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding "said" vandalism on Soprano webpage

Hello, this is EmilyGreene1984. I would like to say that I have not nor had any intention or design to commit "vandalism" on Wikipedia or any of its associations. I was merely trying to correct some of the information that was already posted on the said article or any other said article on Wikipedia. Not to make any excuse, but I admit I do not have alot of experience using Wikipedia and lately, with my busy schedule, I haven't had the time really to go over all the details concerning it. I'm very sorry, if my corrections (which were made in good faith and from reliable sources), have caused any trouble or problems. Sincerely -- EmilyGreene1984 07:08, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Opera definition

Please take a look. I have Folantin's approval of the new language. Please weigh in at the talk page. -- Ssilvers 13:26, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm still waiting for your input on the proposed language. Do you approve it, have an alternative, or would you rather stick with what is there now? Please respond on the Opera talk page. Thanks! -- Ssilvers 01:46, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the response. Yes, I did put in the new language, but I want everyone to be happy, as far as anyone can be happy with compromise! :-)

I left you a question re: your last comment. Best regards, -- Ssilvers 02:56, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

19th Century Opera

You did a very efficient job of fixing the 19th century summary. It makes a lot more sense now. Thanks! -- Ssilvers 03:25, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of notable sopranos

I wonder if you removed the listcruft tag? If so, I wonder if you could explain your point of view on the Talk page? I see the page still doesn't have any explanation of what it's supposed to be for. As you will know other similar pages are redirects to categories. -- Kleinzach 08:37, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]