User talk:Openbrain

Fair use rationale for File:KDX-1 GwangGaeTo RIMPAC 2006 Republic Of Korea Navy.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:KDX-1 GwangGaeTo RIMPAC 2006 Republic Of Korea Navy.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 12:23, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Permission from Korean Navy.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Permission from Korean Navy.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 12:23, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:KDX-1 GwangGaeTo RIMPAC 2006 Republic Of Korea Navy.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:KDX-1 GwangGaeTo RIMPAC 2006 Republic Of Korea Navy.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 00:14, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

HHI

See Talk:Hyundai Heavy Industries#Timelines. Thank you, rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 06:09, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
The next time you make a personal attack, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Calling me "crazy" and "low intelligence" neither helps your stance nor does it justify your edits on Wikipedia. GraYoshi2x►^talk 20:15, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style that should be followed. Thank you. GraYoshi2x►^talk 20:20, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Sungdong Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Sungdong Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sungdong Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:36, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Hyundai Heavy Industries. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 19:01, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:27, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lexus

Please do not redirect the article to Toyota without discussion first, though I suspect that you will find very little support for making the article a redirect. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:54, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The same goes for your redirect of Talk:PlayStation. Neither article is an advertisement. Please stop making these redirects. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:57, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop changing articles to redirects claiming that they are "advertisements". They are clearly not and you are being disruptive. If you continue to do so, I will block you from editing. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:00, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Lexus has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Marek.69 ^talk 00:06, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Account blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

I warned you several times to not make those redirects, but you continued to do so. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:08, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sekwang

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sekwang requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:58, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]