User talk:Oooootron

July 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Adding bogus speedy tags to articles Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:16, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In this democracy, when a page is nominated for deletion, you have the right to vote (once, not with sockpuppets) but it is not the correct procedure to remove tags where someone has nominated deletion. LTRC. Oooootron (talk) 18:20, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Depends you are flagging pages with incorrect reasons so please don't vandalize pages--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 18:23, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 18:23, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at John Baker (singer). disruptive tagging Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:22, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. kelapstick^(bainuu) 18:24, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for what? The John Baker article is a hoax and you fools are keeping it shining!!! Try asking the author, even he'll tell you it is a hoax! --Oooootron (talk) 18:26, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Um what about every other page you flagged, like the List of Jessie episodes?--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 18:28, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

pay television, paranormal, singing, plus a now deleted IP talk page, and your userpage? --kelapstick^(bainuu) 18:38, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

We'll discuss those in due course, for the time being, you explain yourselves in your pathetic attempts to prevent a hoax article being deleted, your injustice towards the editor doing the right thing and misuse of rollback. Stick to the subject, we are talking about John Baker. --Oooootron (talk) 18:51, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, we were wrong about John Baker which has now been deleted. Can we move this conversation onto the others you flagged as spam. Also your flagging of John Baker may have been allowed to stand had it not been for your flagging of other non-hoax articles most (if not all) of which were blatantly not hoax articles.--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 20:42, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]