User talk:Ooodjr

This was certainly the case when the Yanran Protectorate (precursor to the Anbei Protectorate) was first established in 647. But we are now talking about the 660s, which is considered to be the heyday of the Tang Dynasty.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Aza24 (talk) 05:59, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Tang dynasty. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Aoidh (talk) 09:42, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Aoidh (talk) 14:34, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for resuming the edit warring immediately upon expiration of the previous edit warring block. Once you are no longer blocked, please discuss on talk and obtain a consensus before reinserting the content. - Aoidh (talk) 14:38, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't edited three times in a row like yesterday. why are you blocking me?

@Aoidh Ooodjr (talk) 14:39, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring does not require 3 or more reverts to be edit warring. Per Wikipedia:Edit warring: The three-revert rule is a convenient limit for occasions when an edit war is happening fairly quickly; it is not a definition of "edit warring", and it is absolutely possible to engage in edit warring without breaking the three-revert rule, or even coming close to doing so. There is an ongoing discussion and your addition has been reverted several times by several editors. After being blocked for edit warring you immediately made another revert to your preferred version, despite knowing that there is no consensus for the edit and that it is contentious; that is edit warring. - Aoidh (talk) 14:42, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ooodjr. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 12:12, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

what

@Bbb23 what are u doing！？ Ooodjr (talk) 12:34, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fuck you!! Ooodjr (talk) 12:37, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fuck u mother bitch!! Ooodjr (talk) 12:38, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23 Ooodjr (talk) 12:38, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

TPA revoked.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:54, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]