User talk:Oon835

Hello, Oon835, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Red Director (talk) 03:57, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pages

Like I said, creating a page is not what you can call a miracle. You need patience and thorough study, just like how I'm busy doing Leo's draft. Finishing a character page (yet even the series itself has long finished) would take at least six months, unless you opt to remove the Kaiju list. The attack team website you give me, of course its deleted! It was never an official source to look up with. I mean, the writer calls the actor of Musashi Haruno, Taiyo Sugiura as Takayasu Sugiura. And also, he even write Soichiro Sawai's name as "SOH-ICHIROH", which is NOT a way to pronounce a Japanese name. The archived page you just show to me is basically an analogue of the Monster Archives page, which also got deleted as well. Past users (before my intervention) outright copy pasted contents into, let's say, "List of Ultraman Ace monsters" page, and they are instantly taken down by patrolling admins due to lack of source.

The Ultra Monsters page was deleted right before my own eyes. I saw its deletion, so nothing new. The reason why its deleted because that page is outrun with too much vandalisms and the Kaiju lists are not even sourced. They copy pasted and translated from Japanese Wikipedia.

Creating a Ranger Arsenal page is not even necessary. The Sentai pages never get erased by other admins because they were lucky enough to be unnoticed. Remember what I said about Lupin vs Patranger? To create a list page, read here first: Wikipedia:Notability#Stand-alone lists

Zero stylinx (talk) 09:22, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry I will be go easy on it and be patience on it. Oon835 (talk) 13:08, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I got better idea why not you keep this old website (Absolute Ultraman) and add in as a references. Also if the wikipedia admins deleted page why not recreate a new page so that it will be different look and I know that wikipedia admins look more like a security guards. I got 2 questions to ask you how do you type all those words in Japanese but I don't know much about Japanese words and how do I open another new Sandbox so I can leave the first one behind ?

Absolute Ultraman

Your source, the Absolute Ultraman is actually none other than an unofficial blog page. Even if I source it, any patrolling admin would flag it as unofficial. How many times do I have to tell you, in Wikipedia, play by their rules and if you think of recreating a deleted page, think again.

I know how to read in Hiragana and Katakana, while I do consult a friend when reading Kanji. To create a new sandbox, just write in a blank page and put an extension, like User:Oon835/sandbox 2, and so on. The admins can't hurt you this way cause they know its your sandbox.

Zero stylinx (talk) 09:31, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Page characters for Heisei Ultras

While you were right about the page's link, your way of addressing it is also another mistake. I could have created standalone character pages for Ultraman Nexus - Mebius, but for now, I'm busy making one for The Ultraman anime. However, I can assure you that I watched all three seasons so making them is no big deal. But for now, they will be remain as this. With Ultraman Taiga approaching this year, I have to ensure that links to The Ultraman and Ultraman Taro is also available. Remember what I said before: creating a good wikipedia is never an easy task, especially with handling reliable sources. I'm watching an entire season of the Ultraman and currently finishing episode 21. Zero stylinx (talk) 16:36, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Great and Powered sources

Unfortunately the ones you're looking for (G & P sources) are only in the book. I have the scanned book actually, since any means of official website is very thin. Also, I tried putting a Zoffy article in Ultraman and got erased. So how do you expect me to put other appearance in Ultraman and Ultra Seven pages too? Zero stylinx (talk) 12:11, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not taking about the character pages. I only talking about the main article pages (these are the links Ultraman and Ultra Seven) and where it didn't include the "other appearances". Oon835 (talk) 13:16, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What I meant is that all you did in Ultraman and Seven pages is by linking the "Other Appearance" section to their main character page. I did that once and so do a user in a few years ago, but our edits were denied. Those two pages were accustomed to the user whose more advanced than me.Zero stylinx (talk)

But why they denied you? Oon835 (talk) 05:07, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What kind of Source books do you have for Great and Powered? I can still give you this website Thai Toku you can see that user scanned all the pages of the Ultraman books and the other Tokusatsu books also.Oon835 (talk) 16:39, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Japanese Wikipedia have their way of citing what was the book's name and how to cite. Problem is, do you know "how" to do it? I'm totally fine with it since most of the standalone Ultraman pages I made were partly taken from magazine sources that were cited. If you want to do it, read the instructions sources#Books|here and here. Zero stylinx (talk) 23:23, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have a source books. Oon835 (talk) 05:56, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Its all over in G&P's Wikipedia pages. You just have to know how to do it without disturbing the source mode. Zero stylinx (talk) 13:33, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mecha lists

I'm too occupied with other projects now. But since Nexus and Max have to character page, I'll just install a simplified version of it so that they can meet the standards of a Wikipedia article. Just don't expect it to be fancy and all like the character pages I made. Zero stylinx (talk) 09:27, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ultraman pages

For now, I wanted to rest. I'm a Muslim and there's a festive season in 1 week (or so) left, so I have to prepare for it. By the time I resume work, I'll continue with (maybe) 80, but within the Ultra Series, I only work on which shows that have subbed and in order. Zero stylinx (talk) 09:59, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On second thought, I'll take Neos first due to being simple and as I feared that I don't have much time sooner Zero stylinx (talk) 12:03, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lego Jurassic World

Oon835, please keep to the schedule as advised: Get your article through WP:AfC procedures first, then ask for a move of the article. The article should not be moved away preemptively, especially since your article does not appear to be the primary topic. Furthermore, as stated by myself and others, "(2015 Video Game)" is not an appropriate disambiguator. Please discuss before taking any further actions, or proceed as advised with AfC. Pinging @Geraldo Perez, who was subjected to this topic via a secondary discussion. Lordtobi (✉) 05:32, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lists of Lego sets

I'll put the information here as this pertains more to you than to just Talk:The Lego Movie#Sets of Lego Movie. Admins only delete articles if common everyday editors (like me) nominate or propose them deletion. Anyone who does this though MUST give a reason, usually in a Deletion discussion page or in the edit summary of the proposal. Some subjects may be deemed a worthy search term though, and be redirected to the suitable subject. As the content you are referring to are typically stand-alone lists, before you create pages please read these links: WP:GNG, WP:LISTN, WP:INDISCRIMINATE, WP:NOTNEWS, and WP:SUSTAINED. Those are probably going to be your primary hurdles for establishing notability of a subject with independent and reliable third-party references. In the end, if the theme did not gain much news outside of initial product announcement, it likely won't last on Wikipedia. But there are other wikis for that (such as Brickipedia). Thank you, Yosemiter (talk) 12:33, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Yosemiter: Thanks for giving me the guidelines and I won't be afraid of it. I know create a new page is not that easy still. Oon835 (talk) 17:07, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ranger pages

I'm already busy with another project. Also, those Ranger articles originally had their separate articles right before you were here. They were deleted and moved to the main pages because no sources were provided, plus if I were to recreate it, I don't have an actual source (website or book) to cite it. Remember what I told you before, resurrecting a deleted page is a big risk if you repeat the same mistake.

One more thing: since your articles fail to meet the AfC expectations, can I took over Great and Powered? Zero stylinx (talk) 06:53, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! — MarkH21 (talk) 07:02, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello, I'm a new a user and I want to know why Zero stylinx is mad at you? Plth41 (talk) 02:18, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Plth41:: Hello and nice to meet you Plth41. It's kind of long story Zero stylinx is mad at me because he accuse for stealing his sandbox & import into my draft page. I'm telling the true that I'm not stealing his sandbox it's all because I always forgot to ask permission from him and I'm not a bad person. But right now can you please tell KenYokai about the Zords page is now deleted and ask him whether should put the Zords into the Power Rangers Characters Pages or not? Oon835 (talk) 05:16, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will tried talk to KenYokai about it. Plth41 (talk) 07:38, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Plth41:: Please better be carefull when you talk to Zero stylinx he has a bad temper. Oon835 (talk) 05:14, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Oon835. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 22:18, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Oon835 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've never done anything wrong and I believe that this block was in error. Oon835 (talk) 05:15, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Behavioural and/or technical evidence strongly suggests that this account is a sockpuppet. Simple denial is not considered a sufficient reason to unblock the account. In order to be unblocked, you will need to convince the reviewing administrator that there is a better explanation for this apparent connection than the abuse of multiple accounts. Yunshui ^雲 _水 06:53, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Oon835 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to prove that I'm not doing any sockpuppet and I didn't create any multiple accounts. That Plth41 is actually my uncle that he come here and help me out. Oon835 (talk) 07:37, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have stated that you would like this account unblocked because "I want to prove that I'm not doing any sockpuppet and I didn't create any multiple accounts." However, having access to editing privileges will not provide you with any information or features that will assist in the collection or presentation of said proof. The request is, therefore, declined. Chetsford (talk) 09:55, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Oon835 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Can I have a temporary unblock for at least 3 weeks so I can finish edit my pages? Oon835 (talk) 02:23, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Again, this does not address the reason why you are blocked. I have withdrawn your ability to make further appeals. MER-C 09:50, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lego Jurassic World (October 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zppix was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Lego Jurassic World instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lego Jurassic World and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lego Jurassic World, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 23:54, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oon835! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 23:54, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Oon835 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #27055 was submitted on Oct 09, 2019 08:52:22. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 08:52, 9 October 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Oon835 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #27088 was submitted on Oct 11, 2019 08:28:44. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 08:28, 11 October 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Oon835 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #27297 was submitted on Oct 25, 2019 09:06:55. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 09:06, 25 October 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Oon835 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #27550 was submitted on Nov 11, 2019 09:20:23. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 09:20, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Ultraman: The Ultimate Hero characters (December 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clarityfiend was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:LISTN. At this time, lists of fictional characters/planets/places/etc. for much more notable series are being nominated for deletion (and being deleted) in droves. See WP:Afd.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Ultraman: The Ultimate Hero characters and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of Ultraman: The Ultimate Hero characters, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clarityfiend (talk) 08:00, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your email

If you let your "brother" edit, they will be blocked also. WP:MEAT states "A 2005 Arbitration Committee decision established: "For the purpose of dispute resolution when there is uncertainty whether a party is one user with sockpuppets or several users with similar editing habits they may be treated as one user with sockpuppets." -- Amanda (aka DQ) 21:45, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lego Overwatch

Hello, Oon835. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lego Overwatch".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! — MarkH₂₁^talk 08:22, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lego DC Super Hero Girls

Hello, Oon835. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lego DC Super Hero Girls".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! — MarkH₂₁^talk 08:26, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lego The Lone Ranger

Hello, Oon835. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lego The Lone Ranger".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! — MarkH₂₁^talk 08:27, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lego Scooby-Doo!

Hello, Oon835. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lego Scooby-Doo!".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! — MarkH₂₁^talk 08:27, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of Ultraman Mebius characters

Hello, Oon835. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Ultraman Mebius characters".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:49, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Lego Jurassic World (theme) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Lego Jurassic World (theme), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lego Jurassic World (theme)

Hello, Oon835. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lego Jurassic World".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! — MarkH₂₁^talk 06:35, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lego The Powerpuff Girls

Hello, Oon835. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lego The Powerpuff Girls".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:49, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]