User talk:Onoghuren

Understand

Leave this job to the professionals. You are just yesterday's child. Erich rommel (talk) 20:28, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re: SPI help

First of all, SPI is for reporting cases of misuse of multiple accounts, not vandalism. If you do believe this editor is misusing multiple a here are instructions how to report that.

Go to WP:SPI and find the section labeled "How to open an investigation". Click the show button, to reveal the details of that section. The section contains a text box for starting an investigation. In this box, enter the username of the oldest account you think is being misused. If you don't know which one is oldest, a user's registration date can be found on their contributions page. Once you've entered the username, click the submit button. This will take you to the editing for starting the investigation. There will be further instructions on that page. Make sure read them thoroughly. In the text area for editing the page, you'll find a line that reads . On the next line, after the equals sign, enter the username of the other account you believe belongs to the same person. If you believe they are using more than two accounts, there's space for a third username slightly below, and then a fourth, and so on. In the line that begins |evidence= , add a comment explaining why you think the accounts are operated by the same person, and why that use is abusive. Finally, click Publish Changes to submit the report. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:10, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adding to that, I moved your misplaced SPI to a proper location. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 10:37, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring, as you did at Oghuric languages. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 21:15, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Onoghuren (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I provided summaries for my edits, but he randomly reverted them without giving any explanation other than 'rv.' I said that I'll report him to the administration if he'll continue the unexplained edit warring.

I, then created a section on his talk page to discuss the removal reason with him, but he refused to engage. After that, he reverted my edits again and said, 'rv, sure go on.' Pardon me but what the hell? Why did I get blocked?

Bbb23 In administration you said you blocked me for personal attacks and edit warring. The person who reverted my edits didn't give a summary for it.

---

Answer: Bbb23 You don't need to answer this and I don't want to steal your time more, you are pretty much active and blocking other users at this very moment as I see.

"This user has over 60,000 edits and behaves as though he is part of a Wikipedia mafia"

>Beshogur was removing my edits without summary. He filled with "rv." Later I told him that I can report him if he'll continue the unexplained edit reverts. He acts like hes owner of the website. All Wikipedians, including you must fill the summary if you want to do an undo. Of course except some trolling cases. I looked at his edits and I know he is Turkish. I didn't mind talking in Turkish. Iranian users talk in Persian. I didn't create Beshogur's talk page section to report him, so I didn't care about speaking in English.

"If unexplained edit warring continues I will ask help from Administrator intervention against vandalism"

>I see no verbal abuse or personal attacks here. Maybe this is not an encyclopedia for me. Thank you for your time, anyway. I will vanish after the block.

Onoghuren (talk) 21:25, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As you indicate you will vanish after the block, that means that there is no need to remove the block since you don't intend to edit. 331dot (talk) 07:35, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Personal attacks: (1) "This user has over 60,000 edits and behaves as though he is part of a Wikipedia mafia." (2) "If unexplained edit warring continues I will ask help from Administrator intervention against vandalism". Yes, you started a discussion on the user's Talk page, but the correct place to start such a discussion is on the article Talk page, and the discussion should be in English, not Turkish.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:54, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]