User talk:OnlyNano/Archives/2024/October
This is an archive of past discussions with User:OnlyNano. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Verifiability on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Twitter on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:31, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:31, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Question from Seyha Hour (15:23, 20 October 2024)
How can i add my picture --Seyha Hour (talk) 15:23, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hey there! Please see the help page on images. OnlyNanotalk 22:32, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Upcoming expiry of your patroller right
Hi, this is an automated reminder as part of Global reminder bot to let you know that your permission "patroller" (New page reviewers) will expire on 00:00, 28 October 2024 (UTC). For most rights, you will need to renew at WP:PERM, unless you have been told otherwise when your right was approved. To opt out of user right expiry notifications, add yourself to m:Global reminder bot/Exclusion. Leaderbot (talk) 06:23, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
New page reviewer granted
Hi OnlyNano, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.
This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:
- Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
- If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
- If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies
You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! signed, Rosguill talk 14:57, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Wrongful deletion of I formation
I recently edited an article named Capital Development Authority. I added referencing for every information I provided. You have wrongly removed the information Bhatti.Fed (talk) 14:51, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hey there! I removed it because the content you added is completely unsourced. Remember to include reliable inline citations! The rest of the content was completely fine. OnlyNanotalk 14:56, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Specifically it is this paragraph which is the issue (because it has no inline citations for a paragraph):
- "According to a statement issued, PTCL Group and the Capital Development Authority (CDA) Islamabad have entered into a strategic partnership to drive the digitalization of CDA's services. As per agreement, PTCL will deliver digital solutions to support various sectors within CDA Islamabad, including the administration, Excise and Taxation, and Islamabad Police. The partnership will initially introduce 12 key solutions, such as mobility services, call center setup, video conferencing, cloud services, complaint management systems, street lighting, and fleet management." OnlyNanotalk 14:58, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Gentleman, you even deleted the paragraphs which I edited yesterday and had provided appropriate citations for it. You can go and recheck the parts you deleted and tell me where the citations were not mentioned.
- About the paragraph you mentioned in your reply, if you had really paid careful attention to it then you would've seen that the said paragraph was added by me just a few seconds ago before you deleted it. I was in the process of editing it and was about to provide citation for it before you deleted the whole thing. I can still provide citation for the paragraph you mentioned in your reply.
- Deleting someone's work should have some merits. One shouldn't be allowed to delete someone's work without careful consideration. Bhatti.Fed (talk) 19:11, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- citation of the paragraph you mentioned which I was editing when you deleted it.
- https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/943491-ptcl-cda-partner-for-digitalisation Bhatti.Fed (talk) 19:22, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Mention other paragraphs you want citations for or you could just go and recheck for the citations in the content you deleted. Bhatti.Fed (talk) 19:24, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Don't worry! I simply reverted your edit, which means you can still easily rollback the changes to how they were. However, I must take accountability as I used the rollback tool which I should have not have used. It was unnecessary to remove everything, only that paragraph in question. I apologize for this, as I should have been thinking clearer and moving slower.
- To make it easier for you, I am rolling back my changes, so the page will be back to the state where you last edited. OnlyNanotalk 19:27, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Done I have rolled back the changes to when they were last, so you can continue editing! I would like to commend you for your assertive communication with me, and I wish you the best in your future edits! Please let me know if there's anything else I can help with :) OnlyNanotalk 19:31, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- I am thankful to you for your kind consideration. Bhatti.Fed (talk) 05:37, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- Done I have rolled back the changes to when they were last, so you can continue editing! I would like to commend you for your assertive communication with me, and I wish you the best in your future edits! Please let me know if there's anything else I can help with :) OnlyNanotalk 19:31, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Nokia 450
Hi! Thank you so much for the edits! - this is my first article and i had trouble positioning the photos 'n stuff. Sadly im pretty sure i checked every corner of the internet for sources, i did have some luck finding the model on the wayback machine under Nokia.com in 1996. But still, your help is very much appreciated :) Baro Bromberger (talk) 18:03, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- No problem at all! Wikipedia editing norms can be quite the learning curve, so no problem on there! I'll put my surfing skills to the test again, and see if we can find some other sources for this! OnlyNanotalk 18:18, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
Trying to understand an edit
Hey, OnlyNano, I'm trying to understand this rollback that you did to Christian supremacy. I'm not saying that I agree with every aspect of the IP user's edits, but it at least looks at the surface as an attempt to be constructive rather than vandalistic. The IP has no further edits on any page, so it's not that you're undoing someone on a vandalism spree, and I don't see any deeper explanation that would fit WP:ROLLBACKUSE. Can you help me to understand? -- Nat Gertler (talk) 13:44, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hey there, I believe I reverted the wrong edit. I'll go through my contributions and double-check, but I agree... I don't see any reason why I would have reverted this. OnlyNanotalk 17:04, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Still extremely confused about this revert... I would say similar things, it's not the greatest edit, I agree, but it does not break any policies, and thus I have no problem with this edit. Thank you very much for bringing this to my attention, I really appreciate it! OnlyNanotalk 17:23, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for taking care of that. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 20:29, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Still extremely confused about this revert... I would say similar things, it's not the greatest edit, I agree, but it does not break any policies, and thus I have no problem with this edit. Thank you very much for bringing this to my attention, I really appreciate it! OnlyNanotalk 17:23, 28 October 2024 (UTC)