User talk:Onion hotdog

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Onion hotdog, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! GabrielF (talk) 13:47, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anthropology

Hi and welcome to Wikipedia!

I'm the editor that rewrote the article on the multiregional hypothesis a while back into the form it was in just before your edits. Prior to my rewrite the article was a bit of a mess, a result of edit wars between various earlier editors of the page. I appreciate the presence of another editor who has knowledge of the relevant anthropological history.

Did Coon ever refer to his theory as the "Candelabra theory"? My impression is that that title was applied to his theory by writers who interpreted his theory as polygenism, and that the term does give this incorrect impression. For that reason I'd prefer to stay away from it and I'm planning to make some edits accordingly. I have a copy of The Origin of Races but I don't remember Coon himself using the term there; please correct me and feel free to revert my edits to the Coon page if I'm wrong.

I would prefer to keep the focus in the multiregional article on Wolpoff's theory, as the previous theories of Wiedenreich and Coon did not have the full benefit of neodarwinian knowledge of the DNA mechanism of inheritance. For that reason I may be cutting back on your additions to that page. A more complete discussion might be more appropriate for a separate page on the history of the multiregional theory. Warren Dew (talk) 10:02, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Richard Goldsby

The article Richard Goldsby has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. aprock (talk) 02:18, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Oscar Peschel

The article Oscar Peschel has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. aprock (talk) 02:19, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

An incident in which you are involved is being discussed at WP:ANI.·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 20:56, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at Talk:Roger Pearson, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. -- Atama頭 23:25, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing, personal attacks and off-wiki harassment. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:54, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]