Jump to content

User talk:Oneultralamewhiteboy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 2014

[edit]

Information icon Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Cormac McCarthy. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you are given a good deal of freedom in what you write.

My edit on the Cormac McCarthy page was 100% factual and cited by three different trusted sources, including the Smoking Gun, which listed the police report. The story went viral because it is strange, but it is very much true. The only argument against its inclusion was that it was not relevant to the author, but I wasn't screwing around. Thanks. Oneultralamewhiteboy (talk) 16:17, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rarebit Fiend

[edit]

I realize the image is an homage to McCay and the Rarebit Fiend, but that's not how sourcing works on Wikipedia. Please read WP:RS and WP:OR---finding an image online like that and then plunking it into the article without finding a source that discusses it falls under OR. Curly Turkey ⚞¡gobble!⚟ 20:38, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How is that source not reliable? Did you read the article? Here's the quote: "What’s your advice to cartoonists who want to reach a broader readership beyond the usual fan base? First advice is: learn about the history of the form. There are so many old masters to be discovered that serve as inspiration beyond the flavor of the moment: Winsor McCay, George Herriman, Lyonel Feininger, Harvey Kurtzman, etc. I’ve found, consistently, all successful cartoonists know their history."

Kuper clearly states that he's been influenced by McCay. The image alone makes that obvious. I also read in Kuper's adaptation of the Metamorphosis that he states McCay as an influence. How would you suggest I word it to make that clear? Oneultralamewhiteboy (talk) 20:50, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Did you read what I linked to? Do you understand what Original Research is, and why it's a problem for Wikipedia? Further, it's not a good idea to load up an article with lists of people who claim to be influenced---the list for McCay, for instance, would be ponderously long, and anyways it would be better in the main McCay article rather than the Rarebit Fiend one (as the influence is a general one, and not specific to Rarebit Fiend). Curly Turkey ⚞¡gobble!⚟ 21:17, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • I really don't feel it's OR (maybe I should have included more sources?), but I'll agree with you that a lot of influences on a page can be cumbersome. You really should just pick up the book, because if you're as much a McCay fan as you seem to be, I think you'd like Kuper. I don't know how to cite something that's printed. Thanks for your advice and your patience. I'll do better next time. Oneultralamewhiteboy (talk) 21:23, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      • Oh, I'm familiar with Kuper (though I haven't read his Metamorphosis adaptation). I want you to understand, though, that finding that homage strip and adding mention to it is the very definition of OR. Compare to the Veitch and Spiegelman stuff—the references are not from their books or interviews, but from sources discussing the works. That's what we do at Wikipedia—sum up what others have said on the subject.
        If you need help citing something from a print source, I can help you out. Let me know what it is (say, an ISBN) and the page(s) and I can show you how to format it. Curly Turkey ⚞¡gobble!⚟ 22:59, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Draft:Christian Bland, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.last.fm/music/Christian+Bland+&+The+Revelators, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Draft talk:Christian Bland saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! (t) Josve05a (c) 16:25, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christian Bland (December 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

Hasteur (talk) 17:34, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Oneultralamewhiteboy, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hasteur (talk) 17:34, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Your submission at Articles for creation: Christian Bland (June 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Seems the Black Angels may be his best known work and the other information is simply not convincing enough for the needed substance of his own notability. I would not resubmit anytime soon as he's not convincing of the needed independent notability yet.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 07:35, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Christian Bland

[edit]

Hello, Oneultralamewhiteboy. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Christian Bland".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 22:08, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Intelligent Island for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Intelligent Island is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intelligent Island until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RoCo(talk) 17:02, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I merged it, so now how do I delete the Intelligent Island page? Oneultralamewhiteboy (talk)

Preserve

[edit]

I noticed your deletion here. In the future, please keep WP:PRESERVE in mind: fix, rather than delete. -- BullRangifer (talk) PingMe 02:36, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I meant to reverse the edit I made actually because I found a better source that reinforced it, I've just been busy. I'll keep 'preserve' in mind in the future. Oneultralamewhiteboy (talk) 04:12, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Oneultralamewhiteboy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clavis Artis moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Clavis Artis, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 10:43, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Clavis Artis

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Oneultralamewhiteboy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Clavis Artis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Monkeypox vaccine (November 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Monkeypox. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
It appears most this is already covered in the Monkeypox and/or the 2022 monkeypox outbreak articles.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 18:13, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OK, in that case should I move the contributions I've made to this draft to the Monkeypox page, the 2022 outbreak page or both? I think it is important info for people to have. Maybe a redirect for "Monkeypox vaccine" is a good compromise. Thanks, Oneultralamewhiteboy (talk) 19:22, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Since the vaccine is related to Monkeypox in general, I think adding the relevant content to Monkeypox#Prevention makes the most sense. I agree a redirect to that section also makes sense as it is a very plausible search term. You can actually blank the draft then turn it into a redirect (blank draft, add redirect, then move to mainspace) so the history is maintained if a stand-alone article is article is warranted in the future. S0091 (talk) 19:37, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Oneultralamewhiteboy&oldid=1124474666"