Jump to content

User talk:Onepointfive2.0

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, Onepointfive2.0! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! LittleOldMe 14:33, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

You can't say that it refers to the NWP only when it runs through the waterways that seperate the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. The NWP also travels through the Beaufort Sea which is not part of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago and they may be referring to that as well. The quoted references do not make clear what parts of the NWP they are talking about. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 23:18, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

accuracy

[edit]

Thanks for drawing my attention to the Maud (ship). I wasn't familiar with her before. But the article doesn't support your assertion that she traversed the Northwest Passage prior to the St. Roch. Rather she traversed the Northeast Passage.

So, I changed the article.

Cheers! Geo Swan 15:35, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was in the process of writing this and started to wonder if the Federal Government would make the territoral change the name to "Canadian Internal Waters Territorial Park". Found it midly amusing. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 04:45, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A study on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies

[edit]

Hi. I have emailed you to ask whether you would agree to participate in a short survey on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies in articles pertaining to global warming and climate change (survey described here). If interested, please email me Encyclopaedia21 (talk) 19:53, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]