User talk:Onengsevia

November 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently disruptively rejecting community input to the point of ignoring a topic ban by editing the main article about the ban topic in response to a ban notification.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:37, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's hard to find a different interpretation than "intentional disruption" for responding to a topic ban by removing the ban notification and then immediately editing the main article about the ban area ([1] [2]) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:00, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion notification: Clarification regarding details of your ban

Hi Onengsevia,

If I see correctly, you are currently affected by a ban. In the description of the ban, a restriction is described that appears to prohibit you from appealing the ban earlier than six months.

I have noticed this restriction (six months before appealing) at WP:AELOG/2022. As I'm uncertain about whether such a restriction may be made at all, I have asked for advice at WP:ARCA#Clarification_request:_Appeal_restrictions_as_part_of_discretionary_sanctions.

If you agree with what is being said there, I think you can safely ignore this notification. If the arbitrators decide that the restriction is lifted, you'll be notified separately. You are welcome to provide an own statement too, though.

If you can't edit the page, please have a look at the instruction box at the top of the page for an e-mail option.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:16, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Change regarding a previous sanction

Following a clarification request regarding appeal restrictions as part of discretionary sanctions, a sanction placed against you has been amended to remove a previous restriction regarding your ability to appeal. The archived request can be viewed here.
For the Arbitration Committee, –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 19:59, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2022 Suez Canal obstruction

Hello, Onengsevia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2022 Suez Canal obstruction, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tsedey Bank

Hello, Onengsevia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tsedey Bank, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2022 Suez Canal obstruction

Hello, Onengsevia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2022 Suez Canal obstruction".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:24, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]