User talk:Onehundredseventeen

One One Seven

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article One One Seven, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of One One Seven. Kannie | talk 03:22, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't add nonsense to this site. Thank you. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 03:24, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

While you're at it, please don't add nonsense to existing articles. Thank you. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 03:26, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 117 (number). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. HalfShadow (talk) 03:53, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:3RR. Your repeated edits at 117 (number) could lead to your being blocked from editing. Corvus cornix_talk 03:58, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Back off

Wikipedia is not your soapbox. If you have a grievance with Anet, take it to private channels or to a relevant fansite. Inserting rubbish into Wikipedia does nothing but tarnish the image of Guild Wars players. Eric Sandholm 06:34, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]