User talk:OnePapaya

February 2023

Hello, I'm Ingenuity. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Abortion-rights movements have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 16:22, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Abortion-rights movements. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 16:43, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

While the additions may not have been an improvement, I think we need to assume good faith here. I didn't see anything approaching vandalism. Perhaps with an article that routinely gets hit with polarized views and defacement, it becomes easier to react to any reverted edit as vandalism. There was a reasonable explanation given. I see the edit has been made twice. I don't want to alienate a new editor, except to note that reasserting an edit that has been reverted repeatedly becomes disruptive editing, which some may consider a form of vandalism. My two cents. _signed,Willondon (talk) 17:07, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much, Willondon, for your understanding and empathy. :) OnePapaya (talk) 14:40, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Agile software development

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Agile software development, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:25, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Arie van Bennekum

Hello OnePapaya, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Arie van Bennekum, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arie van Bennekum.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|FuzzyMagma}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

FuzzyMagma (talk) 17:10, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]