User talk:Once on a vending machine
|
Issues with your DYK nomination Scattershot (book)
[edit]Just to make you aware, there are a couple minor issues with your DYK for Scattershot (book), first the hook that you provided is a lttle too long. They can only be 200 characters max, the one you provided is 206 characters, it also need to end with a '?'. The other problem is that your article is just a little too short. It needs to be at least 1500 characters of prose, I get 1437 characters. Cheers! --Captain-tucker (talk) 09:22, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. I will make the corrections.Once on a vending machine (talk) 20:45, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Don't
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Punkmorten (talk) 23:38, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Scattershot (book)
[edit]--BorgQueen (talk) 01:43, 9 September 2008 (UTC)==AfD nomination of Scattershot (book)==
An article that you have been involved in editing, Scattershot (book), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scattershot (book). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? dzhastin (talk) 04:38, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Scattershot (book). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. dzhastin (talk) 18:53, 12 September 2008 (UTC)