User talk:On Sober Reflection

Welcome!

Hello, On Sober Reflection, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Goveganplease (talk) 14:05, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (International Consortium on Landslides) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating International Consortium on Landslides.

User:Rosguill while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

The sources currently listed in the article are not enough to demonstrate notability, #1, #3, and #4 are not independent of the subject, and #2 is a mere-mention of the subject. Luckily, there's more coverage online that would appear to establish the subject's notability.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:09, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill: Thanks. Shall I pepper it with a couple of mentions from other sources? On Sober Reflection (talk) 22:18, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On Sober Reflection, that would be good. That having been said, the purpose of getting those additional sources is that an independent source's coverage of a subject will be more reliable than coverage from sources that are affiliated with the subject. Thus, you may very well find more information in those sources that's worth adding. Additionally, readers will be more confident in an article's reliability seeing an article that has sources to primarily independent sources. Only having citations to affiliated sources makes it seem like either the subject isn't that important, or that someone is hiding something. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:46, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Title page - Intellivision Advanced Dungeons and Dragons.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Title page - Intellivision Advanced Dungeons and Dragons.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:18, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]