User talk:Omppuukko

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Omppuukko, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Be Bold!
• Learn from others
• Be kind to others
• Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
• Tell us a bit about yourself
• Our great guide to Wikipedia

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the Help desk, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. We're so glad you're here! User:Marco Chemello (Unipd) (talk) 12:57, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Tip of the day...

Lead Section Size

The lead section of a Wikipedia article is the section before the first heading. The table of contents, if displayed, generally appears between the lead section and the first subheading.

Rule of thumb: If a topic deserves a heading or subheading, then it deserves short mention in the lead.

The lead section should contain up to four paragraphs, depending on the length of the article, and should provide a preview of the main points the article will make, summarizing the primary reasons the subject matter is interesting or notable. The lead should be capable of standing alone as a concise overview of the article, should be written in a clear and accessible style, should be carefully sourced like the rest of the text, and should encourage the reader to want to read more. The following table has some general guidelines for the length of the lead section:

< 15,000 characters	medium size	> 30,000 characters
one or two paragraphs	two or three paragraphs	three or four paragraphs

Prior tip – Tips library – Next tip

Summary essay:

WP:CREATELEAD  

Read more:

Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section  

Become a Wikipedia tipster

To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}}

A warm welcome also by me. --Marco Chemello (Unipd) (talk) 12:52, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank you very much @Marco Chemello (Unipd)! Omppuukko (talk) 13:37, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Good afternoon, Outi! I tried to insert citation for my part and I am not sure about it. These references Gill, Redeker,  and Gasser are the scholars' personal websites. I had some concerns about the "title" of these webpages. When the citation is automatically created the title looks like this:

1. "About – Urs Gasser". Medium. Retrieved 2022-04-16.

I wonder if this is fine Sashavaiss (talk) 09:10, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Dear @Sashavaiss thanks for asking about this.

Can @Marco Chemello (Unipd) maybe help with the question?

In addition, I think that in this part there should be an additional reference to Redeker et al. 2018 academic article and not only the personal websites. Would it be possible for you @Sashavaiss with the help of @Marco Chemello (Unipd) to check this? Omppuukko (talk) 09:24, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

@Omppuukko@Sashavaiss Personal pages of authors are not useful and should not be linked. In general, in the body text of the article you cannot link external websites, you can link only existing Wikipedia articles. External links can be used a) in the External links final section, and b) in the footnotes, if used as a reference. Good work. Marco Chemello (Unipd) (talk) 11:19, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Excellent @Marco Chemello (Unipd), thanks very much for clarifying this.

@Sashavaiss would it be possible for you to 1) remove the personal websites 2) add the article ( [1]https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048518757121 ) as a footnote reference like Marco suggested? That article is actually the correct reference for the entire "Movement" section (and not the personal websites). Thanks very much for your work with this. Omppuukko (talk) 07:17, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Dear @Omppuukko and @Marco Chemello (Unipd), those were the extrenal links I inserted from the original document created by Dublin students. I already removed those links and added the article you mentioned. Looking forward to the meeting today! Sashavaiss (talk) 10:46, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Excellent work @Sashavaiss! Omppuukko (talk) 13:27, 28 April 2022 (UTC)