User talk:Omnificent879

skyscrapers

Add the sources with the commentary. Without the sources, it's unsupported opinion, which isn't acceptable within the framework of wikipedia. Cheers. Anastrophe (talk) 23:59, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Combined Statistical Areas

Sorry Omnificent879, I had to undo your changes to the CSA list adding Tallahassee. I can tell you worked hard on them (found populations, reordered the list, etc...) You are correct that Tallahassee was a CSA with Bainbridge, GA in 2013, but that designation was later removed in later OMB bulletins (18-04 and 20-01). StillWatchesCartoons (talk) 17:29, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello, I'm Gaelan. I noticed that in this edit to World Trade Center (1973–2001), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Gaelan 💬✏️ 04:45, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at World Trade Center (1973-2001), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 10:42, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Fazlur Rahman Khan into Modern architecture. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 11:58, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

cut and pasting text from external websites

Your addition to Gatornationals has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Royal broil 12:19, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see some good to excellent contributions from you. I offer my help if you want to bounce ideas off of me or have questions. You can summon me on any talk page by typing in {{ping|Royalbroil}} along with your question. Royal broil 12:42, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Omnificent879, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Omnificent879! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:09, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Omnificent879! You created a thread called Thank you for inviting me to the Teahouse! at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hello, I'm Aseleste. I noticed that in this edit to List of tenants in One World Trade Center, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~ Ase1este_{charge-parity}^time 09:26, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New section

Hi do you think you could create a list of tenants in 7 World Trade Center (the new building), We are missing that from Wikipedia --Aaron106 (talk) 09:14, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]