User talk:OmniArticleEditor

Hello and welcome to my talk page

Please do not hesitate to contact me regarding my contributions to the Wikipedia project! OmniArticleEditor (talk) 13:30, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

OmniArticleEditor, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi OmniArticleEditor! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, OmniArticleEditor. You have new messages at MelbourneStar's talk page.
Message added 10:14, 2 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Could I please have your input with in regards to the Anno Domini Beats article's creator, and how they think you may have made an error in nominating it for deletion - claiming they've added the sources, you've requested? thanks! —MelbourneStar☆^talk 10:14, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Quadrotor / Quadcopter

Perhaps you should Wikipedia:Proposed mergers? Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 16:52, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello and thank you for writing me. There is nothing to merge. I moved over an old redirect. OmniArticleEditor (talk) 16:54, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

The use of "quadra" to describe a 4-rotor helicopter, as in "quadracopter," is more linguistically correct and more phonetically friendly. SUGGESTION: investigate the need to hyphenate Quadrotor or quadcopter, as in "quad-rotor" or "quad-copter". (76.66.119.161) -peter

A couple points on keeping cool

I'm not sure how long you were editing before you set up this account, so forgive me if I'm just pointing out stuff you already know here. There are two things I hope you'll take away from the discussion experience at Talk:Quadrotor

1. "Don't get upset if your bold edits get deleted." (WP:BOLD)
2. "...those who receive a template message should not assume bad faith regarding the user of said template" (WP:DTR). There are a lot of editors who use templates, and you may get templated again. Calling the next editor who does so "idiotic" won't win you a lot of love or understanding.

I mean it when I say that I believe you're on your way to becoming a great Wikipedian. Part of that process will be learning the policies and guidelines, when to follow them, and when to ignore them. Consensus is not meant to set up bureaucratic obstacles in the path of progress; it's a tool that allows us to improve Wikipedia and all feel positive about the changes at the end of the day. Ibadibam (talk) 21:36, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

A gift

I made you a present. I think it will help avoid situations like the unfortunate misunderstanding you and I had. You can put Template:Don't template me at the top of this page to ward off future templaters. If you have any feedback about the design or wording please feel free to contribute it at Template talk:Don't template me. Hope everything's going swimmingly for you otherwise. Ibadibam (talk) 23:24, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the gesture but a better solution is going to be ensuring that those wanting to use template warnings be better informed about when best to use them. Thanks again. OmniArticleEditor (talk) 21:59, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Do you have an idea how we could do that? Ibadibam (talk) 22:07, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Well for a start on template using tools like Wikipedia:Twinkle and the like there be a caveat section under tool guidance that explains the potential pitfalls of using template warnings. OmniArticleEditor (talk) 22:21, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

I've made a proposal at Wikipedia talk:Twinkle#Proposed DTTR warning. Feel free to chime in. Ibadibam (talk) 22:44, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Bob-google-plus-ascii-art-protest-comment.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:10, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, OmniArticleEditor. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)