User talk:Omkrishnajena
Welcome!
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia, Omkrishnajena! I am Matthewrb and I am the volunteer who received your account request. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions check out Wikipedia:Questions, or feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. Again, welcome! ~ Matthewrb Talk to me · Changes I've made 04:46, 20 August 2022 (UTC) kindly help I am blocked
Your submission at Articles for creation: Madhab Chandra Jena (August 20)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Madhab Chandra Jena and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Omkrishnajena!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 19:20, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Madhab Chandra Jena (August 25)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Madhab Chandra Jena and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Madhab Chandra Jena (August 25)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Madhab Chandra Jena and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
<html> <head>
<meta name="robots" content="noindex"> <title>Don't index this page</title>
</head>
Madhab Chandra Jena moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Madhab Chandra Jena, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PICKLEDICAE🥒 15:57, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
- The author and inventor has a good contribution to science and literature and supported with the reference then where is the issue kindly let me know Omkrishnajena (talk) 14:22, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Madhab Chandra Jena (August 26)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Madhab Chandra Jena and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Madhab Chandra Jena (August 27)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Madhab Chandra Jena and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Madhab Chandra Jena (August 27)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Madhab Chandra Jena and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Speedy deletion nomination of Madhab Chandra Jena
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Madhab Chandra Jena, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PICKLEDICAE🥒 03:22, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- Dear Sir The person is an author in odia language and written 3 books at the same time he is having 5 inventions with registered pattern in Govt. of India.He has many research papers in peer riviewed journals like springer, wiley,taylor francis etc.His books are written in Odia language so not found in websites.He is also having contributions in promoting Odia language through different programs in the region. Kindly let me know which one is the promotional reference I would delete that one.
- Regards Omkrishnajena (talk) 03:32, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- all publications are in peer reviewed Journals and Patent is registered in Govt of India. How it could be a personal only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view.The odia books publised by Renowned publication house in Odisha not self published.The KDP books are self published if you want that portion can be removed but it is coming in google integrated with other pages how I could separate it.All the original links are provided here for peer reviewed journlas and govt approved patents for your reference.You can kindly cross check.
- 7.http://verbalart.in/author_detail.php?a_id=455
- 8.https://thescholedge.org/index.php/sijmas/search/authors/view?firstName=Madhab%20Chandra&middleName=&lastName=Jena&affiliation=&country=IN
- 10.https://museindia.com/Home/ViewContentData?arttype=poems&issid=71&menuid=7044
- 11.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10406026.2020.1714200?needAccess=true
- 13.https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40032-020-00602-6
- 14.https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41810-019-00045-2
- 15.https://aiche.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ep.13360
- 16.https://aiche.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ep.13237
- 18.https://indianreview.in/author/madhab-chandra-jena/
- 19.https://museindia.com/Museindia/ViewAuthorsProfile
- 20. https://museindia.com/Home/ViewContentData?arttype=feature&issid=92&menuid=9010
- 23.https://ipindia.gov.in/writereaddata/Portal/IPOJournal/1_465_1/Part-2.pdf
- 24.https://ipindia.gov.in/ipr/patent/journal_archieve/journal_2016/pat_arch_072016/official_journal_01072016_part_ii.pdf
- 25.https://ipindia.gov.in/ipr/patent/journal_archieve/journal_2016/pat_arch_072016/official_journal_01072016_part_ii.pdf
- 26.https://www.quickcompany.in/patents/off-cut-portion-removing-system
- 30.https://www.quickcompany.in/patents/ejection-system-for-a-web-printing-press Omkrishnajena (talk) 03:51, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Madhab chandra jena
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Madhab chandra jena, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PICKLEDICAE🥒 04:30, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Conflict of interest
[edit]- See also: User talk:Babagyan, User talk:Madhab chandra jena.
Hello, Omkrishnajena. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. – Athaenara ✉ 04:56, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. – Athaenara ✉ 04:56, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- ok as you wish Omkrishnajena (talk) 05:25, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Omkrishnajena (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have tried to create a page who may be notable you can check the details online for his contributions in google, books,news,google scholar,patents etc.I dont think there is any reason to block me for editing
Decline reason:
One open unblock at a time, please. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:34, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Omkrishnajena (talk) 04:59, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Omkrishnajena (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have not committed the mistake knowingly,it has been done unintended kindly unblock me for a better contribution to wikipediaOmkrishnajena (talk) 15:04, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 21:24, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Omkrishnajena (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I understand the reason of blocking me kindly unblock I will not commit any mistake in future
Decline reason:
Please demonstrate your understanding by telling us specifically what was wrong with your edits, what you will do differently, and what productive edits you intend to make. As this request does not do these things, I am declining it. 331dot (talk) 08:09, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Omkrishnajena (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I understand the reason of blocking me kindly unblock I will not commit any mistake in future I had done the mistake because it was my first contribution and unknown about the guidelines and rules
Decline reason:
You still aren't speaking in specifics. If you don't give specifics, you won't be unblocked. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:39, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Omkrishnajena (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
When blocked the reason was written as spam or advertising, my submission is to understand my point of view.I dont have posted anything for advertising about anything nor I have any conflict of Interest. The draft I had made about the person who was known to me and I have added the things/references as available online.If the person is notable then he can be approved as I know the wikipedia has a strong review system, no matter can be passed without sufficient motability.Earlier I was unknown about this hence done some mistakes as I was new I the system.Now I understand the things in wikipedia clearly hence I am sure I will not do any mistake .I would request to give me another chance for contribution by unlocking my account.Thank you for understanding the issue and helpOmkrishnajena (talk) 11:04, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I don't believe that you have no conflict of interest. 331dot (talk) 15:52, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
.
create a new account per WP:CLEANSTART.kindly let me know what to do I am top much confused
Kindly help Omkrishnajena (talk) 11:56, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
- Please do not create a new account. Doing so would be block evasion, and will make it more difficult for you to get unblocked going forth. Please be patient, and someone will be by to review your request. I have removed the duplicate request for you. SQLQuery Me! 20:25, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Kindly unblock me
Kindly unblock me Omkrishnajena (talk) 11:10, 10 February 2023 (UTC) Please help Kindly unblock me Please help Kindly unblock me Please help Kindly unblock me
Please help Kindly unblock me Omkrishnajena (talk) 07:56, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Please help Kindly unblock me Omkrishnajena (talk) 07:56, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Please help Kindly unblock me Omkrishnajena (talk) 07:56, 16 February 2023 (UTC)