User talk:Ombudsperson

Welcome!

Hello Ombudsperson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! JFW | T@lk 16:12, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Link with existing user

Your username and area of interest bears resemblance with Ombudsman (talk · contribs). Is this deliberate? Would you consider choosing another username to avoid confusion? JFW | T@lk 16:13, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for the welcome and the tips. I love my username and I wish to continue using it. I am not trying confuse anyone. I am willing put a disclaimer on my page if someone confuses me with Ombudsman (talk · contribs). Thanks again! --Ombudsperson 19:52, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for your attempts to keep the scientology perspective from defininging the Treatment Advocacy Center Perspective. TAC is on the right track. Scientology is not. (unsigned comment from User:66.108.217.134) 15:47, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Rfc on User:24.55.228.56

Hi - I am seeking support for a user conduct RfC on User:24.55.228.56 (apparently also known as User:Mr j galt) over his conduct on the Plame pages and the Larry C. Johnson page - would you sign on? RfC requires that at least two users tried and failed to resolve the dispute with the user, and I believe that has happened in this case. Let me know and I will propose the RfC. --csloat 08:45, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Because they are so confrontational, I think wikipedia should avoid RFC's on conduct unless there is no alternative. I will review the pages to see if there is anything I can do to help.--Ombudsperson 22:08, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seeking Help

I am preparing conduct RFC's against User:Commodore Sloat and User:Ryan Freisling. They have been harrassing me, including wikistalking, because I have resisted their attempts to push POV in several articles, including Plame Affair and Larry C. Johnson. They and their POV allies have just launched an unjustified attack RFC on my conduct.[1] I will eventually need someone to join me to certify both RFC's. Could you please review the situation. If you agree that their conduct is becoming a problem, could you weigh in on their talk pages or one of the article talk pages (a pre-requisite to certify a conduct RFC)? It would be appreciated. Thanks!--Mr j galt 04:48, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please watch Nightline tonight, Feb. 15

Nightline is going to report on the "Saddam Tapes."

Reportedly armed with 12 hours of Saddam Hussein's audio recordings, the organizers of an upcoming "Intelligence Summit" are describing the tapes as the "smoking gun evidence" that the Iraqi dictator possessed weapons of mass destruction in the period leading up to the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.

U.S. House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence has already authenticated the tapes. These are the same tapes mentioned in Duelfer's Report that had not been translated at the time of the report. For some reason, the tapes were released through a very unusual manner - possibly because some in the intelligence community did not want the truth to come out. The information here will be relevant to many current issue type articles on Wikipedia. Read news story here. [2]RonCram 15:01, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]