Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. --Allen3talk22:54, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I see you've reverted Alton Brown for the fifth time in 24 hours, in violation of WP:3RR. You're obviously pretty new, and I'm sure you're making the change in good faith, so I see no need to report your edits to WP:AN3 yet, particularly since I think you may have a point. Let's discuss it at Talk:Alton Brown. Travisl14:32, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.
I have responded your your comments at Talk:Alton Brown with a explanation of the core problem with your addition. You are encouraged to follow the links in my comments to the appropriate Wikipedia policies and guidelines governing the situation. You should also be aware that continuing to make your addition without addressing the concerns raised on the talk page can result in your being blocked under Wikipedia's policy regarding Wikipedia:Disruptive editing. --Allen3talk22:02, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've just rolled back an addition of yours to Alton Brown, and coming to your talk page to bring it up I see that this is not the first time you've made this addition. Please stop adding your link, I see no evidence that those websites can be described as 'popular culture' and a less trusting admin might assume that you're advertising. If you continue to add that text, you will be blocked. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 15:36, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not undo the redirect until the article has enough content to stand on its own. Saying "an article will be here shortly" does not help the project; a redirect does. Again, please leave the redirect in place until the article exists. -- Merope15:41, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Please respond to the RFC instead of continuing to make the disputed edits. I'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt, but your post-RFC edits are making it difficult. Travisl01:43, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Omallystwin. Thank you. DKqwerty (talk) 22:35, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
