User talk:Olivia Officlal

January 2013

Hello, I'm Geraldo Perez. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Olivia Holt, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:06, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Twitter isn't a reliable source. Acroterion (talk) 04:39, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, stop. Twitter isn't an appropriate source for such material. You're moving into edit-warring to add poorly-sourced material to a biography. Acroterion (talk) 04:45, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Olivia Holt shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Acroterion (talk) 04:46, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you add inappropriately sourced material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Acroterion (talk) 04:48, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Acroterion (talk) 05:00, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Acroterion (talk) 14:24, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]