User talk:Olga Gandurina

Welcome!

Hello, Olga Gandurina, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Guela Tsouladze, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Bbb23 (talk) 20:13, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Guela Tsouladze

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Guela Tsouladze, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bbb23 (talk) 20:13, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Guela Tsouladzé (April 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MicrobiologyMarcus were:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Guela Tsouladzé and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 17:54, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Olga Gandurina! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 17:54, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 18:06, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Olga Gandurina (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Good afternoon! Please consider my request to unblock my account. The reason for blocking, which was pointed out to me, was excessive advertising of the article about Guela Tuladze and the lack of supporting links. I just created my Wiki account yesterday and haven't figured out all the rules yet. I am an art critic, I write articles about art, and perhaps my style was not encyclopedic enough. I will fix it. Perhaps the administrator was confused by the fact that after they deleted the draft that I created yesterday, I found an old draft of an article about the same artist and decided to resume it. I did not have time to put supporting links in the text - but I have many of them. This is not an advertisement. I only want to improve Wikipedia and add French abstract artists from the 1980s, about whom there is little or no information on English Wikipedia. It is Jean Dupuy, Émile L'Augier, Eliza Fantozy, Vincent Scali, Ourel Ricar, Guela Tsuladze and the others. They are well-known artists who formed a whole movement in the fine arts of the late 20th century (free figuration). And I really want to edit other users' articles on art and improve Wikipedia. I really love this project. I tried very hard to make a good article today. It was difficult for me to understand all the technical details. I'm so sorry I didn't handle this and disappointed you. Please, give me a chance! I'm ready to answer your questions Olga Gandurina (talk) 19:38, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Hi. Sorry this has taken so long. Please provide us, right here on this page, some of the supporting links you want to use. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 04:58, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Olga Gandurina (talk) 19:38, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]