User talk:Olexazale

Speedy deletion nomination of HappyBird

Hello Olexazale,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged HappyBird for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. --MrScorch6200 (t c) 19:54, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of HappyBird

Hello Olexazale,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged HappyBird for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. --MrScorch6200 (t c) 20:20, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of HappyBird

Hello Olexazale,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged HappyBird for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. --MrScorch6200 (t c) 20:32, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of HappyBird

Hello Olexazale,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged HappyBird for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. --Regards, MrScorch6200 (talk · contribs) 00:22, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged David Record for Speedy Deletion

Hello Olexazale,

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged this page for speedy deletion. This page has been rejected twice and deleted twice before. Please do not remove this tag, but you can contest speedy deletion for this page. Ireneshih (talk) 09:19, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove speedy deletion tag notice from David Record

This page has been deleted by User:Admrboltz on 13:36, 31 January 2014. If you think page is notable, than you can contest speedy deletion, but do not remove notice. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/David_Record https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:David_Record&action=edit&redlink=1

Ireneshih (talk) 09:33, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at David Record shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 09:35, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to David Record has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: David Record was changed by Olexazale (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.855433 on 2014-02-09T10:03:22+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:03, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Lady Gaga with this edit. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links may include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Seaphoto^Talk 19:35, 10 February 2014 (UTC) [reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Sibtain 007 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here. ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:29, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sand box

Please delete my sandbox because It is consists of wrong information which is effecting the repotation on a company

File permission problem with File:Davidrapper.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Davidrapper.jpg, which you've attributed to A VRT notice was applied over 60 day(s) ago, but no message at VRTS has been found since this tag was applied.. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:41, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]