User talk:Ole7777

Please stop.

Your actions on Dispersion (optics) are on the path to being banned. Learn more about how Wikipedia works before continuing. Johnjbarton (talk) 17:23, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Your recent editing history at Dispersion (optics) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Please stop. Johnjbarton (talk) 17:32, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Ole7777 reported by User:Johnjbarton (Result: ). Thank you. Johnjbarton (talk) 17:45, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Dispersion (optics). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Favonian (talk) 18:44, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ole7777 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The section "== Generalized Formulation of the Higher Orders of Dispersion – Lah-Laguerre Optics ==" has been repeatedly deleted. This section contains the mathematical formulation of dispersion, which is fundamental to understanding the physics behind the theory of dispersion. Its removal significantly undermines the scientific integrity and comprehension of this topic. :Unfortunately it is obvious that Johnjbarton has no idea of what is important in ultrafast optics and should be restricted from deleting valuable inputs Ole7777 (talk) 20:19, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked for violating WP:3RR but don't address this in your unblock request. For example, you could demonstrate that you had prior to the block achieved consensus on the article talk page for your changes. Simply asserting you are correct is not a defense against WP:3RR. Yamla (talk) 20:34, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.