User talk:Oldsunnygirl

June 2008

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Archie Comics, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Hqb (talk) 17:11, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Creation of content-free articles

Hi. Please do not create unnecessary one-line "articles" for various minor Archie Comics publications, such as World of Archie, unless you have substantial, sourced material to include about them. Trivial information, such as publication start/end years, is already available in the main Archie Comics page. Thanks, Hqb (talk) 20:28, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Archie Comics, you will be blocked from editing. Hqb (talk) 21:27, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

regarding Archie Gets a Job

Ahm...sorry, no. It wasn't vandalism. Vandalism is erroneously accusing others of vandalism on purpose, for example. By the way, as I can see here above my message, you're not really in position of telling me that. If you want your article not to be redirected, you need to add more content on it, apart from asserting its notability, with references. Victor Lopes (talk) 22:16, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Elladog for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.

Speedy deletion of Jughead's Pal Hot Dog

A tag has been placed on Jughead's Pal Hot Dog requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Wheelchair Epidemic (talk) 22:34, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Furr's Cafeteria"

A page you created, Furr's Cafeteria, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how it is important or significant, and thus why it should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for companies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. ŦħęGɛя㎥ 00:40, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Comet (Archie Comics), you will be blocked from editing. Hqb (talk) 06:17, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Template:Archie comics, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The official title is Pep Comics, see any decent comic guide. Now please stop your ill-informed editing of this and other Archie articles. If you don't have reliable sources for your changes, just keep your hands off, OK? Thanks, Hqb (talk) 15:23, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Red Circle

Hello. I'm intrigued by your edits to Red Circle Comics, and am wondering if you'd mind mentioning why you don't consider those characters and titles to belong under this heading, please? I presume you're thinking that they were Archie alone, and not Archie-subsidiary Red Circle, but I'm interested in any other, or deeper logic you might be able to explain. :o) Thanks. ntnon (talk) 01:07, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to The Black Hood, you will be blocked from editing. Hqb (talk) 07:20, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please talk to someone here if there's any logic at all underlying your edits, because I'd really like to have it explained, since I can't discern it from what you remove. ntnon (talk) 01:39, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Enough is enough

Despite being asked multiple times to stop, you have once again made a completely bogus edit, replacing correct information with something you made up. It doesn't even agree with what you made up a few days earlier. Virtually all of your "contributions" to Wikipedia have consisted of adding inaccurate (and always unsourced) information, or repeatedly deleting legitimate material (sometimes even explicitly sourced) without any explanation. This is simply unacceptable. Hqb (talk) 19:12, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Djsasso (talk) 19:38, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Web (comics), you will be blocked from editing. Hqb (talk) 07:10, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Shield (Archie Comics), you will be blocked from editing. Hqb (talk) 21:15, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to The Black Hood, you will be blocked from editing. Hqb (talk) 21:54, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of El Rancho Market

A tag has been placed on El Rancho Market requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 23:35, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to TEENick (TV channel) has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Wikieditor06 (talk) 04:35, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page TEENick (TV channel). Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 04:37, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page TEENick (TV channel) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 02:52, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to TEENick (block). If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Caldorwards4 (talk) 02:56, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below.

Nyttend (talk) 03:58, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Sears. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages. 12:29, 23 November 2009 (EST) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.116.24.176 (talk)

December 2009

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Sears. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. 71.116.24.176 (talk) 03:47, 6 December 2009 (EST)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for continued disruptive editing, slowly, and over a long-period of time. Please start to edit appropriately, otherwise your next block may be for an indefinite period of time. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. NJA (t/c) 08:28, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Sears. Such edits constitute disruptive editing and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages. 23:21, 20 December 2009 (EST) 71.116.46.153 (talk)

Vandalism?

I don't see how this was vandalism. Sears is a down-scale department store chain. Middle-scale would be like Mervyns, or what J. C. Penney was like before its 1999 switch to up-scale.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Oldsunnygirl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

it wasn't vandalism

Decline reason:

Who said anything about vandalism? You're blocked for disruptive editing. PhilKnight (talk) 00:44, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

71.116.24.176 said so "if you continue to vandalize wikipedia".

Down-scale source

Do you have a source for continuing to label Sears as "down-scale"? It appears you've been blocked in the past for pushing this issue. --Onorem ♠Dil 18:27, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've been to Sears before, & it seems less fancier than a middle-scale department store chain like Mervyns, or Kohl's. --Oldsunnygirl

Please read WP:RS and WP:OR. --Onorem ♠Dil 04:26, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Beatles' Personnel Listings

Would you please stop changing instruments and lead/backing singer categories? These are already cited, first of all, and secondly, treble guitar is not a commonly used term. Thank you. Radiopathy •talk• 23:36, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to I Want to Hold Your Hand. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Radiopathy •talk• 01:41, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Fox Kids. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Powergate92Talk 01:16, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Associated Artists Productions. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Steelbeard1 (talk) 15:43, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Viacom, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Creativity-II (talk) 02:31, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to the page Desilu Productions appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Creativity-II (talk) 02:33, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to the page Viacom (1971-2005) appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Creativity-II (talk) 04:51, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to take part in a pilot study

I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to a short survey. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates only 5 minutes’’’. cooldenny (talk) 17:19, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits to CBS Corporation

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give CBS Corporation a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Zzyzx11 (talk) 05:08, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Err, how will you have me blocked, when I'm the Wikipedia admin trying to enforce Wikipedia's rules on cut and paste moves, and you're not? Again, please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else.

Also, please keep in mind that per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (companies), it doesn't matter if the company in question officially uses "The" in its name. The common usage is preferred over the official name, so you'll have to provide evidence that this is the case that the most common usage includes "The". Thanks. Zzyzx11 (talk) 05:24, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please undo move

Hi Oldsunnygirl. I see you've moved Jupiter (mythology) to Iuppiter (mythology). I'm sure you've done this with the best of intentions but we're an English language encyclopedia, and we use "Jupiter" as the most common form of the name in English usage - overhwelmingly more common in everyday usage and scholarly sources than "Iuppiter". Please refer to WP:naming conventions and Wikipedia:Naming conventions (ancient Romans). It would be much appreciated if you could undo your changes. Thank you. Haploidavey (talk) 20:00, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Amen. How alarming! Have you any idea how many links there are to this article? Please don't move such a major article without discussion on the talk page. Haploidavey is right: Jupiter is the conventional English form; Iuppiter is Latin. Cynwolfe (talk) 21:21, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly so. In a nutshell (and Wikipedia guidelines), Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English). Haploidavey (talk) 22:02, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this edit, haven't we already gone through this Iuppiter/Jupiter business? Iuppiter is Latin; Jupiter is English. Nothing supports you in this. DItto Juno/Iuno. Please stop it. Cynwolfe (talk) 23:26, 15 July 2011 (UTC) I'm right and ye are wrong![reply]

And what the hell is Juppiter? πϵρήλιο ℗ 19:46, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

pronunciations

Hey,

You might want to read WP:PRONUNCIATION. Whenever we give a foreign pronunciation, we always mark it as such, and we give the English first if it's not obvious. There's a handy little template {{IPA-la}} for Latin, and {{IPA-en}} (also {{pron-en}}) for English. Those link to pronunciation charts for our readers who aren't familiar with the IPA, so if you could follow those conventions things will be clearer for them. (We can change the conventions too if you like, but that's something that should be done on the talk page for the chart, since it will affect a lot of articles.) — kwami (talk) 22:33, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish orthography

FWI, this sort of thing, where you restore a version that you know is contested with no attempt at discussion in addition to blindly undoing unrelated constructive edits, is disruptive. I can see from the series of warnings here that you are having difficulty with this issue. You might want to take a good look at Wikipedia:Disruptive editing. — Æµ§œš¹ _{[aɪm ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɛ̃ɾ̃ˡi]} 01:33, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Warning on page moves

Please stop with the page moves. You've been creating a low-grade mess for others to clean up for some time now, for example at Voiceless palato-alveolar sibilant, and we're starting to get tired of it. Your edits can be reverted easily enough, but for page moves editors may have to make requests for admins to intervene. Please discuss such things on the talk page first, present your evidence (WP:Reliable sources), and get WP:Consensus (or at least a 'fine by me' from another editor) before you move, so we don't end up restricting your editing rights. Thanks — kwami (talk) 19:34, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism?

Are you vandalizing the articles? When you swap things around, as in your recent edit at Wikipedia:IPA for Latin, it's hard to tell if you're doing it on purpose, as a subtle form of vandalism, or if you just don't know what you're doing. If you don't know what you're doing, you shouldn't edit the article. — kwami (talk) 07:30, 15 June 2011 (UTC) I've got the facts right, & you have them wrong![reply]

June 2011

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Thank you. Creativity-II (talk) 08:27, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WARNING

I see you're back to screwing up the pronunciations of articles, without any discussion. We use English on WP-en, not Oldsunnygirlish. It's a pain in the ass to go through your edits and revert them all. If you continue, I will block you for disruption.

This is really annoying. You don't seem to know the difference between the letters A and O, nor between English and Greek. — kwami (talk) 22:55, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Michael, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michèle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 20:00, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Oldsunnygirl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I solemnly swear to obey the rules from now on, & not ignore messages.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:13, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Oldsunnygirl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that disruptive editing’s wrong, & that that’s what you’ve seen this as. I shall now make useful contributions, & I’ll even ask my fellow wikipedians for advice. I’ll think more carefully about my edits from now on.

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but you'll need to explain more in-depth that you 1)understand why your edits were disruptive and 2)can explain how you will change your behavior going forward. TN X Man 14:48, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm not buying this contrition, given that it has a dearth of details and seems a bit confrontational ("[...]& that that's what you've seen this as.") —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 03:36, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You were blocked three times for repeatedly making disruptive edits. B music ian 11:22, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Oldsunnygirl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If not, I'll kill all of the universe's cops!

Decline reason:

In addition to not addressing the issue of your block this request is a misuse of the unblock template. Repeated misuse will result in your losing the ability to edit this page. Tiderolls 02:15, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Really, all the cops will die!

Repeated disruptive editing to your user talk page will also result in a no-talk block. Tiderolls 02:29, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Mmtheend.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Mmtheend.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:20, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]