User talk:Old Bess

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Old Bess, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Talk:Cotton mill. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Racconish^Tk 12:36, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, much appreciated Old Bess (talk) 13:02, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cotton mills

Its good to have a new helper on board- can you check your last edit- can you add your reference to the new facts, and check the sentence two further on- as it fails to make sense now. I personally think that linking Birmingham is over linking as there is nothing in the Brum article that will enhance the readers understanding of the prime topic Cotton Mill- whereas if it had linked to an the unwritten article Engineering innovation in the 18th Century Black Country I would say it was an important link. (If you come across a John Simpson Rutter, (Vicar 1746-95, Wolverhampton) or his grandson (Solicitor, Walsall) those are my direct ancestors- the Watts could have been their clients- but I need a reference.)--ClemRutter (talk) 10:18, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello :) Thanks, I've tried to tidy it a little, cite a source, link to Science Invention rather than Birmingham and I've removed the irrelevance to later patent acquisition. Obviously I take it you've seen this, the library in Birmingham is bound to have information on this person, I'd give them a try 0121 303 1111. Old Bess (talk) 19:01, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have been keeping an eye on the donkey for several years. To honest I don't think it was a significant player- I can find references for mules and donkeys being used while machines were being developed and a couple where animals were used when the water wheel failed but I don't think it was powerful enough to be seriously considered at the point when more than one machine was used- ie when it changed from a domestic situation to a mill. I believe it was tried when the colonials copied the Derbyshire Arkwright type mills in Lowell- the first mill used water and a second one used animals as the prime mover- but that was a dead end. The donkey delivers 250W, the horse 750W- Naismith p604 gives the rule of thumb that in 1896- one horse power was needed to run 85 mule spindles and the necessary prep machines, making it 30 spindles a mule. In earlier mills vast amount of power was dissipated by friction on lineshaft bearings.--ClemRutter (talk) 19:41, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree actually, I'd say it was the utilization of water that made the Mill's viable, however, after having said that, something I believe you could have in the 'First Mills'section is, information on those first Mills which used Wyatt and Paul's Roller Spinning Machine which incidentally needs a separate article to the Spinning Frame which is quite different by the sounds of things). Maybe "2.1.1 Introduction of Machinery (1732)" and then list the info of Paul and Wyatt's Mills, which after all were far more relevant than the asses which failed to help make the equipment profitable. Old Bess (talk) 19:01, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support your assertions

Greetings, Old Bess. I see you have contributed to Headlamp with this edit, and made some comments about your contribution here on the article's talk page. That's not how we do it here, and though you might not have meant to, you have left a mess for someone else to clean up. That's never appreciated. We add only verifiable material to an article, and we cite the reliable source the material came from. We do this in the article itself, not in a comment on the article's talk page. There are tools to make it very easy to do so. My favourite is Reference Generator, which will automagically generate the correctly-formatted text for numerous different kinds of sources. Just fill in the blanks, hit the "Get reference text" button, and then copy the text it gives you and place it after the punctuation of the sentence(s) you're supporting with the ref. Please go ahead and do this now for the material you added to Headlamp so that it can remain in the article. Thanks! —Scheinwerfermann ^T·_C16:54, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Scheinwerfermann, oh no, I do apologise, how rude of me, I'll clean up my 'mess' and cite my source (as I'd already done on the discussion page) right away Old Bess (talk) 22:00, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Thomas Ketland

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Thomas Ketland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. E Wing (talk) 06:05, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:First-weather-map.png

Thanks for uploading File:First-weather-map.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:08, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lanchester 1900s.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lanchester 1900s.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:06, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

World Wide Web

But was the World Wide Web invented in Birmingham? No. Take it from me, including Berners-Lee's parents just because they are from Birmingham sounds desperate - as if Birmingham has no scientific history to speak about (which I'm sure it does). Surely Birmingham can claim better inventions than trying to steal someone else's thunder? Not a 'by-product' invention. If you want to keep it, then fine, but to me it sounds desperate. Stevo1000 (talk) 16:29, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stevo, thanks for the comment. I will take on board your suggestion as we certianly wouldn't want to look desperate, and have another look at this. Originally I was not going to include it in the article, I even removed it myself but then when I realised that his parents (both Brummies) worked on the groundbreaking Feranti computers in Manchester (and much more), I wanted some way to tie it all in, it's more about creating an eye catching article which will draw readers in to explore more about these people and the topics in question, but they do need to be relevant and be worthy of inclusion.

By the way, If you need any help with the Manchester article I can offer some pointers, I picked up quite a bit over time, I took a book out of Birmingham library some years ago which was brilliant and listed hundreds of patents, the book had not been touched for years and it was quite a read, the author had begun an equivalent book about Manchester but he died before its completion, it would be great to try and find these papers and add this to the article on Manchester. Just a thought. Old Bess (talk) 16:42, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the piece on the World Wide Web in the Birmingham article just is a bit far fetched and comes across a bit desperate. If I were you, I would expand on Watt and Boulton's work more in that article, they are very important to the development of engineering in Britain. For me, when I think of Birmingham (aside from Cadbury's) I tend to think engineering, and Boulton and Watt are one of the first names that I associate with the city.

If you have facts on patents made in Manchester, then that could go well with the Science and invention in Manchester. I think I'm going to go more down the route of naming key scientists such as Dalton and successful engineering firsts such as the Bridgewater Canal for that article. Stevo1000 (talk) 17:17, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers Stevo, I'll review that whole piece. The trouble with the Steam Power stuff is that it could take up the whole article and while it would be of interest to maybe you and I others may turn off, what I have tried to achieve is to highlight the city's reputation as a city fo a thousand trades, there is a lot to consider, I'me working on the 20th century images to get them looking right, then I will go through and check all the sources again to make sure it's all cited 100%. You could include the Ferranti Mark 1 for the Manchester article. Old Bess (talk) 10:55, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]