User talk:OlamideGCFR

Draft:Urbanmusic media

Hello, OlamideGCFR. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Urbanmusic media.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:55, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello, I'm Nnadigoodluck. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Naira Marley have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 15:55, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, OlamideGCFR, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 21:39, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hello OlamideGCFR. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:OlamideGCFR. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=OlamideGCFR|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS ^💬 07:20, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.. I am not been compensated by any sort as I was only contact based on the fact that the page was on pending review.. Thanks for understanding

OlamideGCFR (talk) 07:26, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How you own copyrights for these images? also, please stop moving drafts to main and let reviewers do their job. GSS ^💬 07:32, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would refrain from such. Thanks

OlamideGCFR (talk) 07:36, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have not yet answered my question that if you don't have a conflict of interest then how you own the copyrights of images you uploaded on commons.wiki as your own work? GSS ^💬 08:15, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I downloaded them on google , mostly on websites which offered them free with out copyright claims

OlamideGCFR (talk) 19:03, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 18:18, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

OlamideGCFR (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I created my wikipedia account which is solely to help and improve information and data been passed to the public which has been what I have been doing, recently I was contacted by a wikipedia user, he asked me to guide him on publishing a page he worked on and I let him know its improper to publish a page created less than 24 hours of creating it as you to do proper diggings and finding on your subject matter, he told me he had been working on it for sometime offline, I then helped him publish the page knowing fully well the consequences OlamideGCFR (talk) 18:55, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This request boils down to that you were aware of guidelines but went against them anyway. You provide no assurance that this will change in the future. You also have not adequately addressed the copyright issues above as to why you claimed copyright that you did not have. For these reasons, there are no grounds to lift the block at this time, and I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 19:09, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I went ahead to publish the based on the fact he said he had been working on it from he's Microsoft word software, as such I didn't know what else to do, but I already realised my mistake and would do it again,

as regards the image copy right issues, I would say I say a tag appear on most pages saying I should join picture upload challenge on the wikipedia pages which don't have images, I have also realised my mistakes as well and would refrain from same mistake OlamideGCFR (talk) 19:16, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

OlamideGCFR (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I went ahead to publish the based on the fact he said he had been working on it from he's Microsoft word software, as such I didn't know what else to do, but I already realised my mistake and would do it again, as regards the image copy right issues, I would say I say a tag appear on most pages saying I should join picture upload challenge on the wikipedia pages which don't have images, I have also realised my mistakes as well and would refrain from same mistake OlamideGCFR (talk) 19:23, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

In your next unblock request, you need to address the copyright issues. PhilKnight (talk) 10:43, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your draft article, Draft:Carterson

Hello, OlamideGCFR. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Carterson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:10, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gabana Playaz

Hello, OlamideGCFR. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gabana Playaz".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:27, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]