User talk:Olama15432

Richard Quiney

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Richard Quiney, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.william-shakespeare.info/william-shakespeare-timeline-family.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:49, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed it was not clear what you were claiming or asking on the talk page. The mentioned site is clearly marked as Copyright © 2005 William Shakespeare info. Your account shows no previous contributions, so I don't knwo what 'check' you might be referring to. I any case, that timelein would still not show any hint of why there should be an article on 'Richard Quiney'.--Tikiwont (talk) 13:39, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Vernita sheley

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Vernita sheley, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Vernita sheley seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Vernita sheley, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 08:50, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Faklfjlsdkf

A tag has been placed on Faklfjlsdkf, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Elm-39 - T/C 14:30, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Faklfjlsdkf, you will be blocked from editing. Tikiwont (talk) 15:16, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Faklfjlsdkf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. --Tikiwont (talk) 15:27, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Now, apart from heeding above warnings, keep in mind that this is a collaborative project, so you might be interested to know that there is a WikiProject Shakespeare dedicated to the bard where you will find other editors with a similar interest. --Tikiwont (talk) 16:02, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]