Jump to content

User talk:Olaff

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Olaff, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! - Darwinek (talk) 09:51, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FishBase and Wikipedia

[edit]

You haven't got the full welcome message, so here's a copy:

Hello, Olaff! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! —innotata (Talk • Contribs) 21:13, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous


I suggest you take a real look through this. One thing I'd like to note to you, seeing your contributions to pages such as Coregonus albula, is that Wikipedia fish articles always follow the names and classifications of FishBase. —innotata (Talk • Contribs) 21:13, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I am trying my best, particularly as to Coregonus albula] (but inline refs still missing). -Olaff (talk) 22:01, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
What I meant is that the article name chosen should be the FishBase primary one (unless FishBase does not give any or gives the same name for several species), and the name should be referred to completely in lowercase unless it includes a proper noun (brown trout, Atlantic salmon). As for taxonomies, we follow FishBase entirely at the English Wikipedia. Also, might you be interested in the collaboration group (well, in theory it is one) Wikipedia:WikiProject Fishes? —innotata (Talk • Contribs) 15:11, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cherry salmon and redirects

[edit]

Hi Olaff!

I noticed you made some name changes in regarding cherry salmon, straightening out the names. One thing I noticed that when you changed the name, for example from seema to cherry salmon, you did not make cherry salmon the link to the target article Oncorhynchus masou. So the reader clicks on cherry salmon and is redirected to Oncorynchus masou. It is good practice to link directly to the target article, like this cherry salmon. In this link there is no redirect. Just a suggestion. imars (talk) 06:25, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oooops! I always get the link syntax backwards. Fixed. imars (talk) 06:26, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
So much for good practice. Someone just pointed out the following to me: WP:NOTBROKEN. Looks like I do not know as much as I thought. :-) imars (talk) 16:33, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your reversion to herring

[edit]

The recent reversion you made here was not appropriate. Most of the articles you removed are in fact about herrings in general, and not specifically about Clupea. It is true that many of them have a taxon box for Clupea, but they shouldn't have. The herring article on the English Wikipedia had a taxon box too, until recently when I removed it. You should examine each of the interwiki links, passing them through Google Translator. You will find most of them are actually articles about herrings (often based on the original English article), and should be linked from the herring article, and not the Clupea one. Also, please avoid the appearance of edit warring, and take matters like this to the talk page once you have been reverted. There are, sadly, people on Wikipedia, known as "administrators", who are allowed to circle over the editors who write the encyclopedia like hawks searching for carrion, looking for a chance to block them. "Edit warring" is one of their favorite excuses. Editors are particularly vulnerable in this area, because edit waring is not defined with any precision, so administrators can block you at whim. So I'm not going to revert you again, but I ask you to revert yourself, after checking just which links should be reverted. Thanks. --Epipelagic (talk) 04:26, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Response here. Olaff (talk) 17:30, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
And I responded here --Epipelagic (talk) 05:10, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Coregonus maraena, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Whitefish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained deletions

[edit]

Hi Olaff. Lately you have been making a number of unexplained, or inadequately explained deletions, particularly to the articles on cod, herring and salmon. When you delete material, unless it is transparent vandalism, would you please make a separate edit for the deletion and explain adequately in the edit summary why you are deleting it. If your reason is too detailed for an edit summary, then please leave a note on the talk page. Thanks. --Epipelagic (talk) 02:26, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Olaff, would you mind addressing this query. I agree with the concerns expressed there, but it would be good if you can clarify your position. Thanks. --Epipelagic (talk) 08:03, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stellate tadpole-goby, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Don River. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hydrozoan etymology

[edit]

Hello, Olaff! Thanks for the correction at Hydrozoa. I had in fact looked it up in the online OED, which derives the first element simply from MLat hydro-, which in turn mentions no Greek root but hudor. However, your reversion prompted me to look in my dead-trees edition of the original OED, which indeed traces the term to the animal Hydra, with a (vaguely) supporting quote from Owen. (I was quite suprised to see the final A change to an O in the combining form, instead of making *hydrazoa, which is what made me think the etymology implausible at first, but I can accept this as an unsolved mystery for now.) That said, the original Lernaean Hydra is a further step removed; do you think the derivation should mention the animal instead, as the proximate source—or at least in addition to the mythical creature, to complete the chain?—Odysseus1479 02:35, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, yes it would be nice to have both steps explained, but with explicit reference to the sources. --Olaff (talk) 19:43, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Olaff. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cercopagis pengoi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asexual (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gadiculus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page North Cape (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Olaff. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rutilus heckelii, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Don and Roach. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Olaff&oldid=1258270498"