User talk:Ol king col

Ol king col, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Ol king col! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Your customized signature contains a typo: It links to User:Ol King Col, not to your user page at User:Ol king col. Please fix that. Since you don't have a userpage anyway, you may want to link to your user talk page at User talk:Ol king col (this page) instead. Huon (talk) 08:35, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. SmartSE (talk) 20:13, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! 5.226.137.179 (talk) 19:34, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disclosure

I suggest you undertake disclosure per WP:PAID. scope_creep (talk) 12:06, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

scope_creep As per my comment on the Dan Wagner talk page, I'm very surprised that you think I have been acting on behalf of Dan Wagner. On the talk page itself I have been accused, with no evidence, of being out to paint him in a negative light as I've tried to remove what I thought was blatant puffery and bring balance to the page. To the point that I stopped editing the page itself because whenever I did Techtrek (or one of his sockpuppets) would just undo whatever I did and accuse me of vandalism because they were trying to keep the puffery in there.

Appreciate the talk page is very, very long, but I ask you to have a read through, and you'll see that I have tried to reduce the puffery, and engage other authors who were introducing clearly promotional content example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Dan_Wagner#January_2017_Edits or when I tried to remove clear puffery from the intro https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Dan_Wagner#Intro. So I can not undertake disclosure as I have nothing to do with the subject, but will continue to refrain from editing unless / until you feel satisfied that I am not being paid. Ol king col (talk) 13:44, 01 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Yak shaving (talk) 14:07, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]