User talk:Okungnyo

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Okungnyo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - Ahunt (talk) 17:47, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Please do not add "members" sections to band articles as they are generally inappropriate. For instance, you included the band members birthdates in Secret (South Korean band). Such personal information about living people would require reliable sources in order to be included. And even with reliable sources, the band members birthdates are completely irrelevant to the actual subject of the article, a band. Thanks for helping keep our articles encyclopedic by not returning or inserting such inappropriate content! Active Banana (^bananaphone 19:54, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License information needed for File:Google settings products.jpg

Hello, Okungnyo!

It was really helpful of you to upload File:Google settings products.jpg. However, in order to keep and use new images, they need to have a license.

If you can edit the description page and add the appropriate license, that would be great. If you're not sure how or need help, please ask at the media copyright questions page and we'll be happy to assist you.

Thanks again! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:06, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to The Avengers

Your recent editing history at The Avengers (2012 film) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 05:53, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Dunkirk (2017 film), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 17:43, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Dunkirk (2017 film)‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 18:33, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you revert again, you will be blocked. Discuss what you want to change on the talk page. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 12:01, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained reversion

Hi there, re: this, you silently restored fluffy POV content that was submitted by a sockpuppet operator in violation of Wikipedia policies. Did you have a reason for that? I'm unclear on why a neutral encyclopedia would describe something as "tremendous success". Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:09, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dunkirk

Edit summaries are fantastic; pity you don't use them. Please explain why you reverted this edit. An edit summary would have covered this, provided you have a valid reason?The joy of all things (talk) 22:54, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind - I'll take it to the Talk page. Regards.The joy of all things (talk) 23:08, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have raised the issue at Talk:Dunkirk (2017 film)/Archive 1#Controversy. Please comment. Regards.The joy of all things (talk) 16:59, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blade Runner 2049

Nicely done on the improved sourcing on Blade Runner 2049. Hakken (talk) 17:51, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Okungnyo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dunkirk

Thanks for your contributions to the top ten list and awards table (by all means continue at List of awards and nominations received by Dunkirk, as I only moved it there to minimise traffic to the base article). Keep up the great work! Cognissonance (talk) 22:48, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Okungnyo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]