User talk:Okorojude
Welcome!
Hello, Okorojude, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like File:Black-scorpion-benjamin-adekunle.jpg, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.
You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Fred the Oyster (talk) 01:19, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Black-scorpion-benjamin-adekunle.jpg
[edit]A tag has been placed on File:Black-scorpion-benjamin-adekunle.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fred the Oyster (talk) 01:19, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
March 2010
[edit]Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to The 100. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Frank Fontaine (talk) 18:18, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
The article Rankings of Most Influential People in History has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- WP:SOAPBOX essay: wikipedia is not a publisher of editor viewpoints and arguments against another book.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Morbidthoughts (talk) 20:20, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
- Hello! I have removed the above-referenced PROD notice because I fixed the concerns raised above. However, I raised additional concerns on the article's talk page (and renamed the article), and there is still some question of whether this article is viable. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 20:40, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Your contributed article, Rankings of Most Influential People in History
[edit]Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Rankings of Most Influential People in History. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - The 100: A Ranking of the Most Influential Persons in History. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at The 100: A Ranking of the Most Influential Persons in History - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Morbidthoughts (talk) 04:52, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Nigeria
[edit]Hello, Okorojude, I am the original uploader of File:Akure.jpg, of which you uploaded a new version. Since many other major Nigerian cities articles have requested images, could you help?--RM (Be my friend) 16:13, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
Wikiproject Africa
[edit]BelovedFreak 00:17, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Black-scorpion-benjamin-adekunle.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:Black-scorpion-benjamin-adekunle.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:52, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Black-scorpion-benjamin-adekunle.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Black-scorpion-benjamin-adekunle.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:12, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
Proposal to add order of office to Goodluck Jonathan
[edit]Greetings. The revision history statistics of Goodluck Jonathan lists you as one of the article's major contributors. Therefore, I would like to highlight a proposal I've put forward. I believe the order of office of Jonathan (i.e. what number president he is) should be added to the infobox, as happens with other articles. There's a dispute over that, so I wanted to invite you to the discussion on account of your involvement with the article. Thank you: Talk:Goodluck Jonathan#Order of office proposal. HonouraryMix (talk) 12:33, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
- Additionally, my apologies for not giving a clear edit summary to my revert of your adding of a new photo to the article. It's just we don't normally go for photos with texts or images superimposed on them. HonouraryMix (talk) 12:33, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you for your reply, and for your message of support. :) I have to confess I can appreciate where the other user was coming from. In both the pictures, you identified yourself as holding the copyright. Unless you physically took the photo, or recorded the interview, you cannot claim copyright as you have done so. So, I'm afraid I must agree that both pictures are copyright violations. As far as I'm aware, the Nigerian government has not allowed government photos to have free copyright: the fact they're used on their websites does not mean they can be used anywhere else. I agree that different photos would be nice, but unlike the case with Barack Obama (United States government photos are on free copyright), it is difficult to find photos which we can use. But, we'll keep looking. Hope this helps. HonouraryMix (talk) 14:26, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
Warning
[edit]Never ever add another vote to a discussion by pretending to be someone else, as you did here: [1]. The edit history clearly shows you were the one you made that vote, not this other user you pretended to be. I cannot stress how much this is against the rules, and you will get into a huge amount of trouble if you do this again. People have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for less. Don't do it again. HonouraryMix (talk) 09:43, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Okorojude for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page.
File:John saxon.jpg
[edit]Hello Okorojude. I noticed you uploaded this photo of John Saxon. What I'm wondering is, was the photo actually taken by you? Regards, Jafeluv (talk) 12:04, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:President Goodluck Jonathan.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:President Goodluck Jonathan.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 10:41, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
John Saxon
[edit]Hi! I need this photo [2] in polish version of wiki. Help if you can, please. --Morus kot (talk) 19:53, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
would love your collaboration
[edit]www.afropedea.org —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.186.48.62 (talk) 03:29, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
Copyright
[edit]Copyright problems with File:John saxon.jpg
[edit]Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:John saxon.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:John saxon.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:John saxon.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:John saxon.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:John saxon.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:John saxon.jpg.
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 10:15, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
File:Futa logo.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Futa logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 11:36, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library!
[edit]World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you! | |
---|---|
Hi Okorojude! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! SarahStierch (talk) 20:36, 23 May 2013 (UTC) |
Invite to the African Destubathon
[edit]Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most geography, wildlife and women articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing, whether it's a river in Malawi, a Nigerian footballer, or a South African civil rights activist, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. For those of you who signed up to the North African contest, that will hopefully be held in the new year. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:11, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!