User talk:Okerefalls
Welcome
[edit]
|
Irish backstop
[edit]I deleted your additions to Irish backstop for reasons given in the edit summaries. Please see talk:Irish backstop#Principle of consent for a more detailed discussion. --Red King (talk) 10:00, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
April 2020
[edit]
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sydney, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 04:23, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Sydney, you may be blocked from editing. AussieLegend (✉) 04:50, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
To clarify, the claim that the IP added was unsourced,[1] which is why it was reverted. Without a source, this makes the addition appear to be original research which is not permitted by policy and which also makes your reversion's edit summary "Own research" peculiar at best. Your edit summary today, "The original change by Aussie legend was based on a personal view - 'misleading without any source. Reversion doesnt require a source You are" is even more strange. The original change was by the IP, not me. Nobody said that reversion required a source and "You are" doesn't make any sense at all. As it stands, the addition is still unsourced and it clearly requires one. If you persist in restoring the unsourced claim you will almost certainly be blocked so, for your own sake, stop adding the claim. --AussieLegend (✉) 05:10, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
Edit done to say Claim is now sourced. It was only a word in more general comment on prices and scarcity . Surely you know that adding your own research ' somewhat misleading' isnt allowed when what you meant was unsourced. You should know this as a highly accomplished editor.
- It was not my own research. Release of huge amounts of land, particularly out in the west around Schofield has been widely reported. The source you added is dated 2014 so it appears to be no longer current based on that. --AussieLegend (✉) 06:39, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Doesnt matter what you or I think , its what reliable sources say. In my view if something was unsourced and is more likely than not to be correct , collaborating means try find a good source for that item. WP:BESTNP Okerefalls (talk) 03:07, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)