User talk:OkamiItto
Please refrain from inserting unsourced and scurrilous gossip about living persons into Wikipedia articles. If you persist, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please consult WP:BIO and WP:LIVING for further information on our biography policies. FCYTravis 20:00, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
- Sigh. I suppose that since you've back down, I'll have to wait before I do it again. Or, perhaps, the person who originally did it will change it back for me. I do hope so. Censorship doesn't suit the Wikipedia at all.OkamiItto 02:43, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- It's not censorship to remove unsourced derogatory and defamatory material attacking a person. Blogs and Web forums are not considered reliable sources. Please examine our reliable sourcing policy along with the policies on biographies of living people I linked to above. These policies are non-negotiable. If the information is added again by anyone without simultaneous citation of verifiable and reliable sources, the user responsible will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Consider this your fair warning. FCYTravis 03:09, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Then I suggest you remove the entire article, considering there is no verified or cited information presented. To the best of my knowledge, what was being displayed before was indeed factual, and would only be defamatory or derogatory from someone with a very limited world view.OkamiItto 03:13, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- If you wish, you may nominate the article for deletion on those grounds. "The best of your knowledge" is not a reliable source, and the subject of the article objected to the information through the OTRS reporting system as being irrelevant, unsourced and defamatory. Given that it was all three of the above, I removed it per WP:LIVING. FCYTravis 03:25, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Then I suggest you remove the entire article, considering there is no verified or cited information presented. To the best of my knowledge, what was being displayed before was indeed factual, and would only be defamatory or derogatory from someone with a very limited world view.OkamiItto 03:13, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- It's not censorship to remove unsourced derogatory and defamatory material attacking a person. Blogs and Web forums are not considered reliable sources. Please examine our reliable sourcing policy along with the policies on biographies of living people I linked to above. These policies are non-negotiable. If the information is added again by anyone without simultaneous citation of verifiable and reliable sources, the user responsible will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Consider this your fair warning. FCYTravis 03:09, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Deleting image
[edit]Do not remove the image again; it is perfectly fitting to the article. Your NPOV stance is weak at best. Perhaps it is unfortunate that the man caught on fire, but he attained his goal of gaining maximum media attention. Duke53 | Talk 16:14, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:Anti America.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Anti America.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:04, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Advocacy request
[edit]I have taken on your case and there have been a few developments. Please take the time and read over my comments and actions at Wikipedia:AMA Requests for Assistance/Requests/October 2006/OkamiItto. :-) Peace, אמר Steve Caruso (desk/AMA) 17:46, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:18, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Questionable usage of warning template used on User talk:216.128.226.221
[edit]Shouldn't the warning template you used on 216.128.226.221's talk page be {{subst:uw-nor1}}
for adding original research to the article "Savin' Me"? I ask this because I cannot see any recent vandalism to any other article that the user hasn't already been warned for. Lightsup55 ( T | C ) 04:03, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- Ugh, sorry, I was just assuming that the previous warnings added would have been regarded as piling up, leading to the one I used. Feel free to change, if you want. OkamiItto (talk) 05:27, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
File:Dougknife54eq.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dougknife54eq.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. RabidDeity (talk) 20:24, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
File:Dougw.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dougw.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:39, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
Melbourne meetup this Saturday
[edit]Melbourne Meetup
| |
See also: Australian events listed at Wikimedia.org.au (or on Facebook) |
Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup at North Melbourne this Saturday (23 July). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 16 Hope to see you there! JVbot (talk) 04:42, 20 July 2011 (UTC) (this automated message was delivered to all users in Category:Wikipedians in Melbourne)
Melbourne meetup
[edit]Hey all, just a reminder that there's a meetup tomorrow at 11am in North Melbourne. There are more details at the meetup page. Hope to see you tomorrow! SteveBot (talk) 04:51, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
Meetup invitation: Melbourne 26
[edit]Next: 6 January 2013 at La Trobe City Campus |
Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup next Sunday (6 January). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 26. Hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 07:34, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Victoria)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Fair Use in Australia discussion
[edit]As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery