User talk:Ojadi Emeka

Philknight blocked my account I want to ask is he working against the Indigenous people of Biafra that he will allow some people to edit the history with lies What did he wants to gain from allowing that to mislead the public with fake information That Simon ekpa needs to be removed he is not a member of IPOB And he is not related to what IPOB is doing If you need the documentation or news link I will send it to you here Also IPOB's website is Ipob.org not that one those criminals are putting there You need to stop this to maintain good history so not to mislead others

Thanks

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Indigenous People of Biafra, have removed content without a good reason to do so. Content on Wikipedia should not be removed just because you disagree with it or because you think it's wrong, unless the claim is not verifiable. Instead, you should consider expanding the article with noteworthy and verifiable information of your own, citing reliable sources when you do so. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 13:04, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Hello, I'm C.Fred. I noticed that you recently removed content from Indigenous People of Biafra without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The cited source verifies that Uche Mefor is a co-founder of the organization. If you feel this is incorrect, you will need to provide multiple reliable sources that support your claim. —C.Fred (talk) 13:07, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Am Sorry

For Simon Ekpa he needs to removed there because he is not related to IPOB or has anything to do with IPOB That information there is misleading the public For your information Simon ekpa is criminal that has gangs that is enforcing sit at home in the Southeast of Nigeria you can Google that The reason am removing that Simon ekpa is because he is not our member non speaking for Biafrans So please remove that Ekpa there

Also IPOB website is ipob.org not that one you put there So it has to be replaced with the right website information Thanks Ojadi Emeka (talk) 04:06, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Awareness

Before you edit any history you don't know try and ask the members of that group or family before putting up information that will lead to the destruction of that group The public are asking questions why is the name Simon ekpa doing on IPOB History in Wikipedia Who Added him there? That it will mislead the public Mazi Nnamdi kanu said it that Simon ekpa is not working for him And IPOB made it clear that Simon ekpa is not also working for them For your information once again Simon ekpa is a Nigerian government agent whom is working against the restoration of BIAFRA trying so hard to make sure Mazi Nnamdi kanu is not release from DSS custody

That Simon ekpa and fake website should be removed from there

Thanks Ojadi Emeka (talk) 04:08, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Indigenous People of Biafra, you may be blocked from editing. —C.Fred (talk) 17:18, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Indigenous People of Biafra. 2601:1C0:4401:F60:487F:1E4:3F6:B83C (talk) 17:58, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 7 days to prevent further disruptive removal of material. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 18:08, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Am sorry

For Simon Ekpa he needs to removed there because he is not related to IPOB or has anything to do with IPOB That information there is misleading the public For your information Simon ekpa is criminal that has gangs that is enforcing sit at home in the Southeast of Nigeria you can Google that The reason am removing that Simon ekpa is because he is not our member non speaking for Biafrans So please remove that Ekpa there

Also IPOB website is ipob.org not that one you put there So it has to be replaced with the right website information Thanks Ojadi Emeka (talk) 03:45, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Awareness

Before you edit any history you don't know try and ask the members of that group or family before putting up information that will lead to the destruction of that group The public are asking questions why is the name Simon ekpa doing on IPOB History in Wikipedia Who Added him there? That it will mislead the public Mazi Nnamdi kanu said it that Simon ekpa is not working for him And IPOB made it clear that Simon ekpa is not also working for them For your information once again Simon ekpa is a Nigerian government agent whom is working against the restoration of BIAFRA trying so hard to make sure Mazi Nnamdi kanu is not release from DSS custody

That Simon ekpa and fake website should be removed from there

Thanks Ojadi Emeka (talk) 03:56, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

next time, request for an edit to be done as you have a conflict of interest with IPOB. Best, Reading Beans (talk) 06:35, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

really you are saying I should request for an edit

The people that edited it before tell me did they requested for it before misleading the public

Even till now you people have refused to change those things I pointed there

Which shows that you people likes it like that

Those people that is misleading the public with fake information on it Why haven't the admins block those people

Why haven't the admins do proper investigation on that they're editing huh

All this silence and illegal action means that they are comfortable with what they're seeing there which the public did not like Ojadi Emeka (talk) 10:50, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When requesting an edit, you also need to provide reliable sources to support the change. —C.Fred (talk) 02:36, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Restoration of Biafra moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Restoration of Biafra, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 02:38, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chinasa Nworu

The article Chinasa Nworu has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Mccapra (talk) 02:39, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Indigenous People of Biafra, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Ojadi Emeka, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Ojadi Emeka|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. You have clearly declared a conflict of interest with IPOB. You need to make clear whether you are just a grassroots member of the group/movement or if you have been paid to act on IPOB's behalf, including to edit its Wikipedia article. —C.Fred (talk) 02:43, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

am not paid to change anything on or about IPOB

But you are the one paid to mislead the public with fake informations about IPOB

One is that IPOB is not a group is a movement

Also Simon ekpa is not a member of Indigenous people of Biafra non our spokesman

He needs to be removed from there

You people can't just edit what you don't know and threat to block us because of the correction we are doing on lies you people are putting there

I rest my case for now

But first tell me why are you people misleading the public with fake information Ojadi Emeka (talk) 03:02, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am a volunteer editor and not paid. Regarding "fake information", I go with what's backed up in reliable sources. —C.Fred (talk) 03:23, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.vanguardngr.com/2023/08/sit-at-home-ipob-disowns-simon-ekpa/

Click on that and read what is there

Simon ekpa is Nigerian government agent backed up by Nigerian media to make him looks like he is a member to IPOB or a spokesman to Mazi Nnamdi kanu but he is not in anyway

So remove that Simon ekpa and that his media website he is using to defraud people from Finland Ojadi Emeka (talk) 03:12, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing in that article to back up the claim that Ekpa is working for the Nigerian government. However, IPOB's renunciation is enough to remove him from the infobox. —C.Fred (talk) 03:27, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Indigenous People of Biafra, you may be blocked from editing. —C.Fred (talk) 03:31, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

please advice 1st contributor to stop associating Simon ekpa autopilot with IPOB

Also their are some changes needs to be done on that ideology please I will add it here too for you to see it Ojadi Emeka (talk) 13:46, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Borgenland (talk) 14:23, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:30, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chinasa Nworu

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Chinasa Nworu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. BangJan1999 16:55, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:UniBrill per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/UniBrill. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spicy (talk) 21:07, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Restoration of Biafra

Hello, Ojadi Emeka. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Restoration of Biafra, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:06, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]