User talk:Oi! South

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Oi! South (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I not a sock i'm sorry because i'am better editor than that. Also he didn't block me properly. I will be careful next time. Oi! South (talk) 04:49, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. only (talk) 02:57, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bettifm

Bbb23 how did you undid one of my reports for Bettiman as a possible sock of Bettifm because it isn't good enough or are you playing stupid. Sockpuppets are allowed to report before they are blocked indef so why you would let me Check the sock of Bettifm. I will not know. Oi! South (talk) 05:18, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]